Bearing in mind the events if the last 18 years (from wars, globalisation, the "war on terror" and its consequences, "economic crisis and stagnation, Arab uprisings, migration and cruel borders, to the rise of the far-right nationalism ... one might find the following conclusion, written in 2000, still pertinent: "The liberal individualist analytical corset does not fit the world as it is. It fails to strap American power into its prognosis of a supra-state order. It fails to identify mechanisms that can pull the social dominance – both economic and political – of the Pacific Union states over other societies under cosmopolitan governance. It fails to spot how the spread of liberal democratic polities is combined with the undermining of the conditions for their organic consolidation. And finally it does not recognise that intervention by powerful states in the name of liberal individual rights is inevitably and inescapably arbitrary given the haphazard political...
“The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion (to which few members of other civilizations were converted) but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.” —Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilisation and the Remaking of the World Order, 1996, p. 51