Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts from December 4, 2016
The 'Heil Trump' Nazi Spencer had a debate with a Hillel rabbi , Rosenberg. Rosenberg tried to wash Spencer with the 'love and inclusion' which is sup posedly what 'Judaism teaches'.  “My tradition a teaches a message of radical inclusion and love,” Rosenberg said. “Will you sit down and learn Torah with me, and learn love?” Spencer declined the invitation, but offered a rejoinder in which he suggested that the objectives of Zionism and Jewish continuity were close to his own goals for white people. “Do you really want radical inclusion into the State of Israel?” Spencer said. “And by that I mean radical inclusion. Maybe all of the Middle East could go move in to Tel Aviv or Jerusalem. Would you really want that?” Rosenberg was silent. “You’re not answering,” Spencer said. “I’m not answering,” Rosenberg said. Spencer went on to argue that Jewish continuity is predicated on resistance to assimilation. “Jews exist precisely because you did not a...
The hypocrisy of it. Just a week or two ago a leader columnist of the FT was defending " free market democracy " against Wolfgang Streeke's criticism.  Anyway, people are indifferent to this and are accepting the status quo. Even the far-right support is not coming from this aspect in the system.
الاضراب Ų§Ł„Ł‚Ų§Ł†ŁˆŁ†ŁŠ Ų§Ł„Ų°ŁŠ تعتمده النقابات ŁŁŠŲŖŁ… ؄علام السلط به من خلال ŲØŲ±Ł‚ŁŠŲ© قبل Ų¹Ų“Ų±Ų© Ų£ŁŠŲ§Ł…، ŁˆŲŖŲ³ŲØŁ‚Ł‡ Ų­ŲŖŁ…ŁŠŲ§ "جلسات ŲµŁ„Ų­ŁŠŲ©" Ł‡Łˆ في Ų§Ł„Ų­Ł‚ŁŠŁ‚Ų© Ų§Ł„Ų“ŁƒŁ„ Ų§Ł„Ł†ŲøŲ§Ł…ŁŠ Ł„Ł„ŲŖŲ­ŁƒŁ… في حركة Ų§Ł„Ų“ŲŗŁŠŁ„Ų© ŁˆŲ¶ŲØŲ·Ł‡Ų§، ŁˆŁ…Ł† جهة أخرى ŁŁ‡Łˆ Ų·Ų±ŁŠŁ‚Ų© Ł„Ų§Ų³ŲŖŁŠŲ¹Ų§ŲØ التمردات ŁˆŲ­Ų§Ł„Ų© الغضب ŁˆŲ§Ł„ŲŖŁ†ŁŁŠŲ³ عنها ŲØŲ¬Ų±Ų¹Ų§ŲŖ Ł…Ų­Ų³ŁˆŲØŲ© Ł„ŁŠŲŖŲ­ŁˆŁ„ الاضراب، من Ų“ŁƒŁ„ Ł†Ų¶Ų§Ł„ŁŠ، الى حلقة من حلقات Ų§Ł„ŲŖŁŲ§ŁˆŲ¶ ŲØŁŠŁ† السلطة ŁˆŲ§Ł„Ł†Ł‚Ų§ŲØŲ© Ų§Ł„ŲŖŁŠ ŲŖŁƒŁˆŁ† قد Ų£Ų³ŲŖŁˆŁ„ŲŖ لا على قرار الاضراب ŲØŁ„ على Ų§Ł…ŁƒŲ§Ł†ŁŠŲ© ŲŖŁ†ŁŁŠŲ°Ł‡، ŁˆŁ‡ŁƒŲ°Ų§ ŁŠŁŁ‚ŲÆ الاضراب Ł…Ų­ŲŖŁˆŲ§Ł‡ Ų§Ł„Ų­Ł‚ŁŠŁ‚ŁŠ ŁˆŁŠŲŖŲ­ŁˆŁ„ الى Ł…Ų¬Ų±ŲÆ ŲŖŁ†ŁŁŠŲ° لقرارات ŁŁˆŁ‚ŁŠŲ© ŁŠŲŖŁ… الاعلان عنها  ŁƒŁ…Ų§ ŁŠŲŖŁ… سحبها من Ł‡ŁŠŲ§ŁƒŁ„ Ł‡ŁŠ في الغالب Ł…Ų¬Ł‡ŁˆŁ„Ų© من أوسع Ų¬Ł…Ł‡ŁˆŲ± العمال ŁˆŲ§Ł„Ł…ŁˆŲøŁŁŠŁ† Ų§Ł„Ų§ŲÆŲ§Ų±ŁŠŁŠŁ†. الاضراب Ų§Ł„Ų¹Ų“ŁˆŲ§Ų¦ŁŠ، أو Ł…Ų§ ŲŖŲ³Ł…ŁŠŁ‡ Ų§Ł„ŲØŁˆŲ±Ų¬ŁˆŲ§Ų²ŁŠŲ© "الاضراب Ų§Ł„ŁˆŲ­Ų“ŁŠ" (ŁˆŁ‡Łˆ بالفعل وحؓي وخطير)، Ł‡Łˆ Ų°Ł„Łƒ الاضراب Ų§Ł„Ų°ŁŠ ŁŠŁ†ŲÆŁŲ¹ Ų§Ł„ŁŠŁ‡ العمال في Ų“ŁƒŁ„ Ų¬Ł…Ų§Ų¹ŁŠ وبروح Ł†Ų¶Ų§Ł„ŁŠŲ© Ų¹Ų§Ł„ŁŠŲ©، ŁŁŠŲŖŁ… ŲŖŁ‚Ų±ŁŠŲ±Ł‡ ŁˆŲŖŁ†ŁŁŠŲ°Ł‡ في نفس Ų§Ł„ŁˆŁ‚ŲŖ ŁˆŲØŲ“ŁƒŁ„ فجائي ŁˆŲØŁ…Ų“Ų§Ų±ŁƒŲ© Ų£ŲŗŁ„ŲØŁŠŲ© العمال قرارا ŁˆŲŖŁ†ŁŁŠŲ°Ų§، ŁˆŲØŲÆŁ„ Ų§Ł„ŲŖŁŲ§ŁˆŲ¶ ŁŠŲŖŁ… رفع المطالبات المحددة. وفي الغالب تتسم Ł…Ų«Ł„ هذه الاضرابات ŲØŲ·Ų§ŲØŲ¹ Ų¹Ł†ŁŠŁ ŁˆŁ…ŲµŲ§ŲÆŁ…Ų§ŲŖ Ł…Ų¹ الأعراف أو Ł…Ų¹ Ł‚ŁˆŲ§ŲŖ Ų§Ł„ŲØŁˆŁ„ŁŠŲ³. قد ŁŠŲ­Ł‚Ł‚ الاضراب Ų§Ł„Ł‚Ų§Ł†ŁˆŁ†ŁŠ Ł…ŁƒŲ§Ų³ŲØ أكبر من الاضر...

Henry Kissinger

"Prospective imperialists can turn to his  authorized biographer  Niall Ferguson for answers. Harvard’s specialist in restoring the devil’s reputation — having done so previously for the  House of Rothschild  and the  British  and  American  empires —  argues  that if we weigh the good (the United States winning the Cold War) against the bad (the “loss of life in strategically marginal countries”), Kissinger comes out a hero. Fortunately, those of us unwilling to perform that calculus have Greg Grandin’s  Kissinger’s Shadow: The Long Reach of America’s Most Controversial Statesman .  The book avoids the trap of simply enumerating Kissinger’s crimes and actually takes its subject’s worldview seriously. Since the actual trial of Kissinger will never happen and the intellectual trial has  already  taken place, Grandin follows a different path: he traces how Kissinger’s ideas have come to dominate American fore...
"[T]he  aspiration of fractions of the Islamic bourgeoisie to strengthen their positions in the power structure, or rather to modify the place they occupy within the confessional political system, in order to better share the hegemony and not to change the system . . . This solution is not actually a solution; it will lead only to a worsening of the crisis of the system." — Mehdi Amel Hezbollah and the Workers

Britain: Mad Dogs and "Englishness"

  Nationalism "in any imperialist society is bound up with chauvinism, and Britain is an imperialist society, with England its historical core, which has always been defined by its status in the imperialist hierarchy, whatever William Hague says to the contrary.  Orwell’s efforts to situate the basis for socialism on the terrain of culture and “ Englishness ,” which admittedly had a certain proto-Gramscian quality in its approach to popular culture as a strategic factor in political struggles, surely represent the last serious attempt to articulate something like a left-wing “Englishness.”  It was certainly light years ahead of the mawkish, demagogic detritus that passes for the same attempt these days.  Yet it failed rather badly, for two reasons.  First, because it misjudged the class basis for any post-war socialism, estimating that the perpetual growth of a functionary and technician class would be the basis for a rational yet national post-capitalist syste...
"The Syrians who are fighting their state are indefensible. Too bearded to be trusted, fratricidal on top of that, they are defying the laws of geopolitics in the Middle East, and could very well provoke World War III. Syrians, then, must not be defended. But what can be done faced with the spectacle of indignity streamed almost live from Syria since 2011? This spectacle is unprecedented. Never before in history has a crime against humanity been filmed day by day, turned int o a spectacle with the cooperation of both victims and executioners, broadcast by the big television networks and streamed on social media, intercut with ad breaks, consumed by the general public, and commodified by the art market. At the time of Auschwitz, only God was supposed to see what happened in the showers. It was only after the liberation of the camps that accredited filmmakers could capture evidence of the crimes, which were recognized as such by the legal authorities. Those images, however, were co...