Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts with the label “class conflict”

The Modern Tradition of Ethnic and Political Cleansing (Part 5)

Cleansing After 1945 Michael Mann I have shown that modernity generated two different conceptions of  democracy. First, North-Western European and white settler régimes had a pronounced sense of class conflict, and sought to institutionalize it. Thus they developed and deepened forms of liberal, not organic, democracy among themselves. But the white settlers developed an organic conception of their whole community as opposed to alien indigenous ‘others’. They practised severe forms of ethnic cleansing upon them, including the commission of genocide. Second, the different circumstances of Central, Eastern and Southern  Europe, meant that not class but ethnic stratification became the central political issue. Unlike classes, most ethnic or religious  communities are not necessarily interdependent. They can live in  their own cleansed communities, with their own organic state. They were increasingly doing so. In two distinct ways, th...

The Modern Tradition of Ethnic and Political Cleansing (Part 1)

Michael Mann, 1999 Read an introduction here If the people or nation is conceived of as being internally stratified, then the state’s main role is to mediate and conciliate amongst its competing interest groups. Such a state preserves diversity among its citizen body and so is relatively unlikely to encourage ethnic and political cleansing among it. Yet, if the people or nation is conceived of as organic, as ‘a perfect union, one and inseparable’ (as in ‘The American Creed’), then some leaders and movements may be tempted to seek to enhance the ‘purity’ of the organic people or nation by suppressing the real-world diversity of its seeming members. Indeed, many modern régimes which claim to be democratic have exhibited a pronounced tendency toward ethnic and political cleansing. We must distinguish between different types and degrees of ‘cleansing’, and we must clearly state that most do not approach genocide. The mildest types have been the most common. They are induced assimilation, i...

Ethiopia

Our media are dominated by ethnic strife while largely ignoring class struggles “Ethnic differences entwine with other social differences –especially of class, region, and gender. Ethnonationalism is strongest where it can capture other senses of exploitation. The most serious defect of recent writing on ethnonationalism has been its almost complete neglect of class relations (as in Brubaker, 1996; Hutchinson, 1994; Smith, 2001). Others wrongly see class as materialistic, ethnicity as emotional (Connor, 1994: 144–64; Horowitz, 1985: 105–35). This simply inverts the defect of previous generations of writers who believed that class conflict dominated while ignoring ethnicity. Now the reverse is true, and not only among scholars. Our media are dominated by ethnic strife while largely ignoring class struggles. Yet in actuality these two types of conflict infuse each other. Palestinians, Dayaks, Hutus, and so on believe they are being materially exploited. Bolsheviks and Maoists believed t...