"For the sceptical reader the whole strategy of the book looks like this. Take a highly selective, historically contentious and anachronistic view of the Enlightenment. Don't be too scrupulous in surveying the range of positions held by Enlightenment thinkers - just attribute your own views to them all. Find a great many things that happened after the Enlightenment that you really like. Illustrate these with graphs. Repeat. Attribute all these good things your version of the Enlightenment. Conclude that we should emulate this Enlightenment if we want the trend lines to keep heading in the right direction. If challenged at any point, do not mount a counter-argument that appeals to actual history, but choose one of the following labels for your critic: religious reactionary, delusional romantic, relativist, postmodernist, paid up member of the Foucault fan club."
The Enlightenment of Steven Pinker
And also a review of Pinker's previous book on "the decline of violence"
Steven Pinker's Apologetics for Western-Imperial Violence
The Enlightenment of Steven Pinker
And also a review of Pinker's previous book on "the decline of violence"
Steven Pinker's Apologetics for Western-Imperial Violence
Comments