Skip to main content
Algeria 09 March 2019

All signs indicate so far that another social movement will be co-opted (by the regime and the imperial powers), diverted (through a manoeuvre by the military) and if not, crushed.


"The people want the overthrow of the gangster regime"

"Leave" (one of the slogans that had been raised in the Tunisian uprising)



Algeria's angry youth (the Guardian)

and a view of an Algerian activist:


"A few thoughts on developments in Algeria as well as the way they are being represented in both Algerian and international (social) media. 
First, it goes without saying that we are living through incredibly exciting times. Just yesterday, 15 MILLION Algerians took to the country's streets and even more if we take into consideration protests taking place in solidarity elsewhere across the world. Second, it also goes without saying that for those of us who have been involved in social movements over the past several years that our optimism is always cautious- we know there are always powerful forces out there seeking to co-opt, depoliticize, de-radicalize and take advantage of the new space created by this mobilization to destabilize and infiltrate (e.g. just two days ago a US navy ship docked in the Algiers port for ‘scheduled visit’ but we know from past experience and what’s happening today in places like Venezuela, Syria, etc. that an imperial military can and will only act to further imperial interests). 

We have learned from past and ongoing revolutionary struggles (including Algeria’s own anti-colonial resistance, Palestinian liberation movement, as well as more recent regional experiences) that the battle is not only fought on the street, but also in who gets to interpret, frame, represent and narrate the popular demands (e.g. look how the dominant framings focus on the refusal of Boutaflika’s 5th mandate and silence more radical demands. This could end up serving the interests of anti-Boutaflika status quo forces).
With this in mind, let us highlight and amplify the more radical voices of this mobilization that stand on the shoulders of our ancestors- across the Maghreb/Africa, Asia, Latin America- who fought the colonizers and have continued even once the colonial militaries and administrations left to fight the forms of (neo)colonial exploitation, resource extraction and dispossession that they brought with them. 
Let us amplify the voices demanding political-economic structural transformation but rooting these claims in the solid defence of our sovereignty. Let's amplify the voices calling for cultural, intellectual and epistemological decolonization. We can only honor our mujahideen/mujahidette by fulfilling their dreams and ensuring their lights are not dimmed… It is our generation’s calling to bring their struggle to fruition and keep their torch ablaze. 
Today more than ever, I am so proud of my people."
—Brahim Rouabah, 09 March 2019

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Qarmatians (Al-Qaramita)

By Nadeem Mahjoub Documentary film-makers G. Troeller and M. C. Defarge once asked a cabinet minister in South Yemen, why socialistic ideas were so readily acceptable in that part of the Arab world. He replied: “Because we have been communists for a thousand years! My mother was Qarmatian.” Official Muslim scholars and clerics, and many so-called moderates (whether individuals or groups) oppose sedition ( fitna ). Tensions and contradictions in society should be solved peacefully and even if the ruler was unjust and impious, it is generally accepted he should still be obeyed, for any kind of order is better than anarchy and sedition. “The tyranny of a sultan for a hundred years causes less damage than one year’s tyranny exercised by the subjects against one another.” Revolt was justified only against a ruler who clearly went against the command of God and His prophet.” 1 Here we look at not what happened in the minds of people who call for calm, oppose dissent and preach the re...
John Gray, the Guardian, 03 March 2015: "To a significant extent, the new atheism is the expression of a liberal moral panic." "There is no more reason to think science can determine human values today than there was at the time of Haeckel or Huxley. None of the divergent values that atheists have from time to time promoted has any essential connection with atheism, or with science. How could any increase in scientific knowledge validate values such as human equality and personal autonomy? The source of these values is not science. In fact, as the most widely-read atheist thinker of all time [Nietzsche] argued, these quintessential liberal values have their origins in monotheism." "The reason Nietzsche has been excluded from the mainstream of contemporary atheist thinking is that he exposed the problem atheism has with morality. It’s not that atheists can’t be moral – the subject of so many mawkish debates. The question is which morality an atheis...

Capitalism

Some of this reminds me of how five or six years ago in a class of seven students in a UK elite university three of them (two Germans and one British) were in favour of a "benevolent dictator" (in the Arab context). The bloody horrors of Pinochet showed how capitalism will react when it's threatened
Varoufakis "speaks of how great it was to have the support of Larry Summers, Norman Lamont, and other figures on the Right, but it was support for whom, for what, and in whose class interests? Class analysis is far from the foreground of the picture sketched out here. Closed rooms and class war
"A second position argues against transition, which is transitology itself. It is well known—especially among economists—as the sudden mobilization of a considerable mass of experts who are generally foreigners,generally Western, who come to preach the good word and to propose ready-made models of democracy. The science of the transition has become a financial windfall, a market. And the word transition has of course become a reflex of language, a term of reference, a call for tenders ( appel d’offres ) to which the whole society was supposed to respond.  Consequently, the reticence that one can express is the following: our history is framed, transition is a heteronomy. Every democratic revolution is henceforth supposed to take a unique, imposed path, which is, at the same time, indistinctly democratic and liberal (or neoliberal). A more or less non-“negotiable” package.  It is necessary to highlight the imposed character (and imposed from the outside) of this coming to t...
"By 2003, the Libyan government had entered into relations with the International Monetary Fund, privatizing a number of state-owned enterprises. In 2004, Libya opened up 15 new offshore and onshore blocs to drilling. Campbell also chronicles the burrowing actions of the “Western-educated bureaucrats [who] worked to bring Libya into the fold of ‘market reforms,’ and the deepening commercial relations with British capital.”  In 2007, British Petroleum inked a deal with the Libyan Investment Corporation for the exploration of 54,000 square kilometers of the Ghadames and Sirt basins. It also signed training agreements for Libyan professionals, helping create a base for neoliberalism within the government. By 2011, 2800 Libyan professionals were studying in the United Kingdom, learning “Western values” of destatization and thus the removal of the possibility for production and power to be responsive to the demands of the people.  Libya under Qadhaffi was mercurial, but against ...

Europe's Refugee Camps

"Just three and a half years after the signing of the refugee deal, these camps have become symbols of Europe's failure to protect those who knocked on its door for help. These camps, with Moria chief among them, are now places where already traumatised people are stripped off their dignity." The invisible violence of Europe's refugees camps