Skip to main content

Arab/Muslim Women

"This image has also become a stereotype because it is simplistic in its pitting supposedly free sisters in the West against wretched victims in Arab countries. Muslim societies are assumed to have sweeping patriarchal structures, while it is claimed that Western societies are pictures of progressive modernity, says Swiss social anthropologist Annemarie Sancar. Neither of these absolute views are correct."

The West's gleeful obsession with "oppressed Arab women"

Further reading:

Islam in Liberalism by Joseph A. Massad

"In his analysis of the emergence of 'military humanitarianism,' David Chandler notes that the development of the NGO regime prevalent in the 1980s focused on 'capacity buidling,' 'empowering,' and 'civil society' (and this is of course in line with the democratisation ideas...that Muslims lack civil society and one has to be created for them to advance democracy), 'as they argued the need for a long-term involvement in society and a sphere of influence independent from the a Third World state.' In their stead, the human rights NGOs cretaed a Thirld World 'hapless victim in distress' that needed to be rescued by the NGOs of the First World who play the role of their 'saviour' from the villain, the non-Western government or state authorities that caused famine and poverty through personal corruption or wrong spending policies or that consciously embarked on a policy of genocide or mass repression.' For those deploying it, the narrative of salvation and rescue, remains consciously or unconsciously, with the Christian tradition and mission underlining it, and a continuation of the history of the capitulations Christian Europe imposed on the Ottomans.

Lila Abu-Lughod [2002] volunteers her Egyptian native informants to authorise her plea to Western feminists: "I have done fieldwork in Egypt over more than 20 years and I cannot think of a single woman I know, from the poorest rural to the most educated cosmopolitan, who has ever expressed envy of US women, women they tend to perceive as bereft of community, vulnerable to sexual violence amd social anomie, driven by individual success rather than morality, or strangely disrespectful of God." Abu-Lughod's plea is contextualised in the American feminist endorsement of the US attack on Afghanistan."

Strangely though, Lughod sees there is a duty for Western feminists to 'help' poor Afghan women. Such a desire for providing "help" has been expressed to me directly by 19-year old white Western students—a raw material trained to carry the mantra of the imperialist ideology of "easing the suffering of the unfit and helpless Other."

Anne Norton (2013) explains the implications of Western women's participation in "the project of liberating–or simply defeating–the Muslim world" on the Western women themselves:
In participating in this campaign, [these Western women] learn to look upon Western models of sex and sexuality as liberating, universally valid, and exempt from criticism. They are turned away from the advancement of women's position at home and enlisted in projects of imperial domination."
Instruments of liberal citizenship, Interpal Grewal (2005) contends, "produce liberal subjects as objects and subjects of rescue ... Feminist NGOs were contituted as key to this goal, and they worked to manage the 'global' population of women whose welfare became increasingly their concern." 

"This rescue mission continues the coupling of the liberal and the Christian missions of salvation as one and the same. Moreover, the governmentalisation of saving and rescuing women renders both the Euro-American and European states and Western and local NGOs the main imperial agents of rescue at the same time as it enjoins the local state to limit its role to the issuance and enforcement of legislation in line with Western norms while forcing it, in line with the neo-liberal order, to withdraw from the provision of economic and social services to the population."

—Massad, Islam in Liberalism, Chicago 2015, pp. 138-45
 

Popular posts from this blog

The Qarmatians (Al-Qaramita)

By Nadeem Mahjoub Documentary film-makers G. Troeller and M. C. Defarge once asked a cabinet minister in South Yemen, why socialistic ideas were so readily acceptable in that part of the Arab world. He replied: “Because we have been communists for a thousand years! My mother was Qarmatian.” Official Muslim scholars and clerics, and many so-called moderates (whether individuals or groups) oppose sedition ( fitna ). Tensions and contradictions in society should be solved peacefully and even if the ruler was unjust and impious, it is generally accepted he should still be obeyed, for any kind of order is better than anarchy and sedition. “The tyranny of a sultan for a hundred years causes less damage than one year’s tyranny exercised by the subjects against one another.” Revolt was justified only against a ruler who clearly went against the command of God and His prophet.” 1 Here we look at not what happened in the minds of people who call for calm, oppose dissent and preach the re...

Capitalism

Some of this reminds me of how five or six years ago in a class of seven students in a UK elite university three of them (two Germans and one British) were in favour of a "benevolent dictator" (in the Arab context). The bloody horrors of Pinochet showed how capitalism will react when it's threatened
"If you don't attack the economic power of the elite, soon or later it will attack you." That's what the Arab uprisings, for instance, were unable/failed to do. K for Karl – Revolution (episode 3)
"A second position argues against transition, which is transitology itself. It is well known—especially among economists—as the sudden mobilization of a considerable mass of experts who are generally foreigners,generally Western, who come to preach the good word and to propose ready-made models of democracy. The science of the transition has become a financial windfall, a market. And the word transition has of course become a reflex of language, a term of reference, a call for tenders ( appel d’offres ) to which the whole society was supposed to respond.  Consequently, the reticence that one can express is the following: our history is framed, transition is a heteronomy. Every democratic revolution is henceforth supposed to take a unique, imposed path, which is, at the same time, indistinctly democratic and liberal (or neoliberal). A more or less non-“negotiable” package.  It is necessary to highlight the imposed character (and imposed from the outside) of this coming to t...
"In the same way that Robinson [Crusoe] was able to ob­tain a sword, we can just as well suppose that [Man] Friday might appear one fine morning with a loaded revolver in his hand, and from then on the whole relationship of violence is reversed: Man Friday gives the orders and Crusoe is obliged  to work. . . . Thus, the revolver triumphs over the sword, and even the most childish believer in axioms will doubtless form the conclusion that violence is not a simple act of will, but needs for its realization certain very concrete preliminary con­ditions, and in particular the implements of violence; and the more highly developed of these implements will carry the day against primitive ones. Moreover, the very fact of the ability to produce such weapons signifies that the producer of highly developed weapons, in everyday speech the arms  manufac­turer, triumphs over the producer of primitive weapons. To put it briefly, the triumph of violence depends upon the pro­duction of a...
Varoufakis "speaks of how great it was to have the support of Larry Summers, Norman Lamont, and other figures on the Right, but it was support for whom, for what, and in whose class interests? Class analysis is far from the foreground of the picture sketched out here. Closed rooms and class war

US

 Written in June: The candidate who emerged from this jumble of discontent was the man who promised to do the least. His party is now preparing to give us a national election that will be little more than a referendum on the hated Donald Trump. Finally we have a climate in which the American public would unquestionably choose dramatic change were it offered to them, and the party of change has contrived to ensure that it will not be offered. Instead our choice is between two elderly and conservative white men, both with a history of stretching the truth, both with sexual harassment accusations hanging over them, and neither representing any possibility of energetic democratic reform. The old order has been miraculously rescued once again. Such is the climate of opinion in America that, with the right leader, remarkable things would be possible. Instead we are presented with Joe Biden, an affable DC veteran with a hand in many of the defining disasters of the last 30 years: worker-c...