According to this BBC clip, China became communist in 1949.
And we know through schooling, the "cold war", the media, the common people we meet everyday and the experts that China was "communist" until very recently.
According to the man in the interview, "there's a long way to go to reach the final goal of building a communist society."
Now who should I believe the BBC's journalist or a Chinese 'illiterate', who has never been educated in how to describe socio-economic formations and did not know that "communism" existed in many countries and failed. Could it be that he is just brainwahsed and still believes in an ideal?
Here is what the British Academy wrote in an introduction to a conference last year: "2019 will mark the 70th anniversary of the People's Republic of China, which aimed to create the world's largest socialist society." (my emphasis) However, a few lines down we read, "This conference will gather scholars of China offering new perspectives on the revolution, life under socialism [sic], and the establishment of a new political order."
An Academy that cannot write something consistent. From a country that 'aimed to create socialism' to 'life under socialism.'
Leaving the difference between communism and socialism aside, sloppiness and inaccuracy has a purpose.
And we know through schooling, the "cold war", the media, the common people we meet everyday and the experts that China was "communist" until very recently.
According to the man in the interview, "there's a long way to go to reach the final goal of building a communist society."
Now who should I believe the BBC's journalist or a Chinese 'illiterate', who has never been educated in how to describe socio-economic formations and did not know that "communism" existed in many countries and failed. Could it be that he is just brainwahsed and still believes in an ideal?
Here is what the British Academy wrote in an introduction to a conference last year: "2019 will mark the 70th anniversary of the People's Republic of China, which aimed to create the world's largest socialist society." (my emphasis) However, a few lines down we read, "This conference will gather scholars of China offering new perspectives on the revolution, life under socialism [sic], and the establishment of a new political order."
An Academy that cannot write something consistent. From a country that 'aimed to create socialism' to 'life under socialism.'
Leaving the difference between communism and socialism aside, sloppiness and inaccuracy has a purpose.