Skip to main content

Guns, Germs and Steel

The  links  connecting  livestock  and  crops  to  germs  were  unforgettably illustrated  for  me  by  a  hospital  case  about  which  I  learned  through  a  physician  friend.  When  my  friend  was  an  inexperienced  young  doctor,  he  was called  into  a  hospital  room  to  deal  with  a  married  couple  stressed-out  by  a mysterious  illness.  It  did  not  help  that  the  couple  was  also  having  difficulty communicating  with  each  other,  and  with  my  friend.  The  husband  was  a small,  timid  man,  sick  with  pneumonia  caused  by  an  unidentified  microbe, and  with  only  limited  command  of  the  English  language.  Acting  as  translator  was  his  beautiful  wife,  worried  about  her  husband's  condition  and frightened  by  the  unfamiliar  hospital  environment.  My  friend  was  also stressed-out  from  a  long  week  of  hospital  work,  and  from  trying  to  figure out  what  unusual  risk  factors  might  have  brought  on  the  strange  illness. The  stress  caused  my  friend  to  forget  everything  he  had  been  taught  about patient  confidentiality:  he  committed  the  awful  blunder  of  requesting  the woman  to  ask  her  husband  whether  he'd  had  any  sexual  experiences  that could  have  caused  the  infection. 

As  the  doctor  watched,  the  husband  turned  red,  pulled  himself  together so  that  he  seemed  even  smaller,  tried  to  disappear  under  his  bedsheets,  and stammered  out  words  in  a  barely  audible  voice.  His  wife  suddenly screamed  in  rage  and  drew  herself  up  to  tower  over  him.  Before  the  doctor could  stop  her,  she  grabbed  a  heavy  metal  bottle,  slammed  it  with  full force  onto  her  husband's  head,  and  stormed  out  of  the  room.  It  took  a while  for  the  doctor  to  revive  her  husband  and  even  longer  to  elicit, through  the  man's  broken  English,  what  he'd  said  that  so  enraged  his  wife. The  answer  slowly  emerged:  he  had  confessed  to  repeated  intercourse  with sheep  on  a  recent  visit  to  the  family  farm;  perhaps  that  was  how  he  had contracted  the  mysterious  microbe. 

This  incident  sounds  bizarrely  one-of-a-kind  and  of  no  possible  broader significance.  In  fact,  it  illustrates  an  enormous  subject  of  great  importance: human  diseases  of  animal  origins.  Very  few  of  us  love  sheep  in  the  carnal sense  that  this  patient  did.  But  most  of  us  platonically  love  our  pet  animals, such  as  our  dogs  and  cats.  As  a  society,  we  certainly  appear  to  have  an inordinate  fondness  for  sheep  and  other  livestock,  to  judge  from  the  vast numbers  of  them  that  we  keep.  For  example,  at  the  time  of  a  recent  census, Australia's  17,085,400  people  thought  so  highly  of  sheep  that  they  kept 161,600,000  of  them. 

Some  of  us  adults,  and  even  more  of  our  children,  pick  up  infectious diseases  from  our  pets.  Usually  they  remain  no  more  than  a  nuisance,  but a  few  have  evolved  into  something  far  more  serious.  The  major  killers of  humanity  throughout  our  recent  history—smallpox,  flu,  tuberculosis, malaria,  plague,  measles,  and  cholera—are  infectious  diseases  that  evolved from  diseases  of  animals,  even  though  most  of  the  microbes  responsible for  our  own  epidemic  illnesses  are  paradoxically  now  almost  confined  to humans.  Because  diseases  have  been  the  biggest  killers  of  people,  they  have also  been  decisive  shapers  of  history.  Until  World  War  II,  more  victims  of war  died  of  war-borne  microbes  than  of  battle  wounds.  All  those  military histories  glorifying  great  generals  oversimplify  the  ego-deflating  truth:  the winners  of  past  wars  were  not  always  the  armies  with  the  best  generals and  weapons,  but  were  often  merely  those  bearing  the  nastiest  germs  to transmit  to  their  enemies.

The  grimmest  examples  of  germs'  role  in  history  come  from  the  European  conquest  of  the  Americas  that  began  with  Columbus's  voyage  of 1492.  Numerous  as  were  the  Native  American  victims  of  the  murderous Spanish  conquistadores,  they  were  far  outnumbered  by  the  victims  of  murderous  Spanish  microbes.  Why  was  the  exchange  of  nasty  germs  between the  Americas  and  Europe  so  unequal?  Why  didn't  Native  American  diseases  instead  decimate  the  Spanish  invaders,  spread  back  to  Europe,  and wipe  out  95  percent  of  Europe's  population?  Similar  questions  arise  for the  decimation  of  many  other  native  peoples  by  Eurasian  germs,  as  well  as for  the  decimation  of  would-be  European  conquistadores  in  the  tropics  of Africa  and  Asia. 

Thus,  questions  of  the  animal  origins  of  human  disease  lie  behind  the broadest  pattern  of  human  history,  and  behind  some  of  the  most  important issues  in  human  health  today.  (Think  of  AIDS,  an  explosively  spreading human  disease  that  appears  to  have  evolved  from  a  virus  resident  in  wild African  monkeys.)  This  chapter  will  begin  by  considering  what  a  "disease" is,  and  why  some  microbes  have  evolved  so  as  to  "make  us  sick,"  whereas most  other  species  of  living  things  don't  make  us  sick.  We'll  examine  why many  of  our  most  familiar  infectious  diseases  run  in  epidemics,  such  as  our current  AIDS  epidemic  and  the  Black  Death  (bubonic  plague)  epidemics  of the  Middle  Ages.  We'll  then  consider  how  the  ancestors  of  microbes  now confined  to  us  transferred  themselves  from  their  original  animal  hosts. Finally,  we'll  see  how  insight  into  the  animal  origins  of  our  infectious  diseases  helps  explain  the  momentous,  almost  one-way  exchange  of  germs between  Europeans  and  Native  Americans. 

Jared Diamond, Guns, Germs and Steel, 1999 ed.

Popular posts from this blog

The Qarmatians (Al-Qaramita)

By Nadeem Mahjoub Documentary film-makers G. Troeller and M. C. Defarge once asked a cabinet minister in South Yemen, why socialistic ideas were so readily acceptable in that part of the Arab world. He replied: “Because we have been communists for a thousand years! My mother was Qarmatian.” Official Muslim scholars and clerics, and many so-called moderates (whether individuals or groups) oppose sedition ( fitna ). Tensions and contradictions in society should be solved peacefully and even if the ruler was unjust and impious, it is generally accepted he should still be obeyed, for any kind of order is better than anarchy and sedition. “The tyranny of a sultan for a hundred years causes less damage than one year’s tyranny exercised by the subjects against one another.” Revolt was justified only against a ruler who clearly went against the command of God and His prophet.” 1 Here we look at not what happened in the minds of people who call for calm, oppose dissent and preach the re...
John Gray, the Guardian, 03 March 2015: "To a significant extent, the new atheism is the expression of a liberal moral panic." "There is no more reason to think science can determine human values today than there was at the time of Haeckel or Huxley. None of the divergent values that atheists have from time to time promoted has any essential connection with atheism, or with science. How could any increase in scientific knowledge validate values such as human equality and personal autonomy? The source of these values is not science. In fact, as the most widely-read atheist thinker of all time [Nietzsche] argued, these quintessential liberal values have their origins in monotheism." "The reason Nietzsche has been excluded from the mainstream of contemporary atheist thinking is that he exposed the problem atheism has with morality. It’s not that atheists can’t be moral – the subject of so many mawkish debates. The question is which morality an atheis...

Capitalism

Some of this reminds me of how five or six years ago in a class of seven students in a UK elite university three of them (two Germans and one British) were in favour of a "benevolent dictator" (in the Arab context). The bloody horrors of Pinochet showed how capitalism will react when it's threatened
Varoufakis "speaks of how great it was to have the support of Larry Summers, Norman Lamont, and other figures on the Right, but it was support for whom, for what, and in whose class interests? Class analysis is far from the foreground of the picture sketched out here. Closed rooms and class war
"A second position argues against transition, which is transitology itself. It is well known—especially among economists—as the sudden mobilization of a considerable mass of experts who are generally foreigners,generally Western, who come to preach the good word and to propose ready-made models of democracy. The science of the transition has become a financial windfall, a market. And the word transition has of course become a reflex of language, a term of reference, a call for tenders ( appel d’offres ) to which the whole society was supposed to respond.  Consequently, the reticence that one can express is the following: our history is framed, transition is a heteronomy. Every democratic revolution is henceforth supposed to take a unique, imposed path, which is, at the same time, indistinctly democratic and liberal (or neoliberal). A more or less non-“negotiable” package.  It is necessary to highlight the imposed character (and imposed from the outside) of this coming to t...
"By 2003, the Libyan government had entered into relations with the International Monetary Fund, privatizing a number of state-owned enterprises. In 2004, Libya opened up 15 new offshore and onshore blocs to drilling. Campbell also chronicles the burrowing actions of the “Western-educated bureaucrats [who] worked to bring Libya into the fold of ‘market reforms,’ and the deepening commercial relations with British capital.”  In 2007, British Petroleum inked a deal with the Libyan Investment Corporation for the exploration of 54,000 square kilometers of the Ghadames and Sirt basins. It also signed training agreements for Libyan professionals, helping create a base for neoliberalism within the government. By 2011, 2800 Libyan professionals were studying in the United Kingdom, learning “Western values” of destatization and thus the removal of the possibility for production and power to be responsive to the demands of the people.  Libya under Qadhaffi was mercurial, but against ...

Europe's Refugee Camps

"Just three and a half years after the signing of the refugee deal, these camps have become symbols of Europe's failure to protect those who knocked on its door for help. These camps, with Moria chief among them, are now places where already traumatised people are stripped off their dignity." The invisible violence of Europe's refugees camps