Skip to main content

UK

This is a good summary, but lacks a political economy perspective.

“The cycle will continue for as long as politicians refuse to address the reasons why people come to Britain to seek asylum. To take an example, the 120 people who were intercepted in the Channel on 4 August came from Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Pakistan, Palestine, Sudan and Yemen. Of these countries, two were invaded in recent history by a coalition that included the UK; one has been pushed into famine by a Saudi-led bombardment using British weapons and military expertise; one is in a prolonged conflict with Israel, which like Saudi Arabia is a UK ally; and the others, most of which are former British colonies, are places where there is long-term, well-documented persecution of particular ethnic and social groups.”

The more fundamental question of [failure of] economic development, the political economic policies pursued by the ruling classes in the aforementioned countries is missing. People become migrants in the search of a better life away from war and persecution, but also because of the persistence of [under] unemployment and poverty at home.

Don’t be fooled by the myth of a ‘migrant invasion’

Related
Violent Borders: Refugees and the Right to Move by Reece Jones

Comments