There is little historical evidence to trust that any French leader would have done things differently.
The rights of global south populations cannot possibly match those bestowed upon the civilised masses in Europe, so why undermine the potential for profit for those who are so disposable? Or perhaps his universalism is genuine - which would explain his own commitment to violent repression of political movements and the repeated assaults on civil liberties in France.
The French state’s relationship to "rights" is always connected to its own interests, as is the “terrorism” it claims to fight.
Sisi and the hypocrisy of France’s so-called defence of human rights
Comments