Skip to main content

Iraq and Syria: The True Cost of War

Beginning in 2014 and 2015 respectively, US and Russian interventions would in time lead to some 75,000 air strikes against Iraq and Syria.

However much the coalition’s actions against ISIS (Daesh) and Russia’s support for Assad differ in intent and context, both have been disastrous for people on the ground; the bombing campaigns alone have killed between 20,000 and 55,000 Syrian and Iraqi civilians.

The alliance’s figure of 1,417 civilian deaths has been widely contested. In December 2021 a New York Times investigation based on a review of 1,300 Pentagon reports concluded that ‘the air war has been marked by deeply flawed intelligence, rushed and often imprecise targeting, and the deaths of thousands of civilians, many of them children, a sharp contrast to the American government’s image of war waged by all-seeing drones and precision bombs.

The coalition claims it values transparency and is willing ‘to work with anyone making allegations or providing new, credible information’, but several NGOs have put forward higher figures for civilian casualties. The Syrian Network for Human Rights (SNHR), a UN-accredited organisation founded by Syrian opponents of the Assad regime, puts the number of civilian casualties to date at 3,047. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR), a London-based group, believes 3,847 civilians, including more than a thousand children, may have been killed in six years of coalition raids.

Airwars has come up with a significantly higher total. Classifying incidents according to how credible they are — information being treated as ‘confirmed or fair’ if it comes from two ‘credible sources’ — it estimates between 8,317 and 13,190 civilians have been killed in Iraq and Syria by coalition bombs. It puts the number of children killed at between 1,765 and 2,363. Of this total, Airwars claims to have identified 3,715 individuals. Its website gives names, witness testimony and sources. Including incidents where evidence is inconclusive or partial, Airwars comes up with an even higher figure of between 19,284 and 29,643 civilian deaths. The upper end of this estimate is 20 times greater than the coalition’s official figure.

Chris Woods from Airwars, who regularly lobbies coalition officials to verify dozens of past incidents, remains convinced ‘the coalition was the primary source of destruction at Raqqa.’ How can we be sure? Woods cites Airwars’s joint investigation with Amnesty International on the bombing of Raqqa. He says, ‘ISIS firepower was significantly limited in Raqqa, and the Syrian Democratic Forces were denied the use of heavy weapons. Based on the available public evidence, there are strong indications both that civilians died at El Bedo and that those deaths were caused either by a coalition air or artillery strike.’

Amnesty International and Airwars estimate that 1,600 civilians died in the city as a result of American, British and French air raids and artillery fire during the coalition-led offensive between June and October 2017 alone.

According to an Associated Press investigation, Iraqi and coalition forces were responsible for at least 9,000 civilian deaths from airstrikes, mortar and artillery fire during the liberation of the city of Mosul. In 2017, however, the international coalition acknowledged only 326 civilian deaths in the fighting. Airwars says more civilians than ISIS fighters died in the battle for Mosul.

‘The French, like the Belgians, Danes and British, don’t want to discuss civilian casualties, because it’s a source of shame,’ Woods says. ‘French officers will acknowledge they caused civilian casualties, but they won’t say where and when, because the coalition is structured in such a way that only the perpetrators of strikes pay compensation [to victims’ relatives].’

Unlike the coalition, Russia publicly maintains that no civilians have been harmed in its six years of operations in Syria. But according to the SNHR, Russia’s bombing campaigns killed 6,867 civilians between September 2015 and June 2021… Airwars says it has collected evidence that, by the summer of 2021, the Russian military had caused between 4,096 and 6,085 civilian deaths in the course of approximately 39,000 airstrikes. It leaves unconfirmed whether an additional 23,062 people died ‘locally from Russian military actions in Syria’.

Independent military expert Anton Lavrov, a consultant for the Moscow daily Izvestia, is dubious about the claim that Russia’s intervention has caused no civilian deaths: ‘This is highly unlikely: the main difference between Russia and the NATO countries is the use of mainly unguided weapons on the Russian side, which cause far more collateral damage than “smart” weapons. That said, since 2015, we’ve seen Russian aviation tactics gradually evolve to increase the accuracy of their strikes and reduce harm to civilians.’

So of 594,000 people allegedly killed on Syrian territory in the decade from the start of the revolution on 15 March 2011 to 14 March 2021, the SOHR claims to have documented — in addition to civilians killed by the Russian army — the deaths of 88,856 civilians attributable to loyalist regime forces, 8,110 to Syrian fighters from rebel factions, 6,418 to ISIS, 1,474 to the Kurds and 12 to the Israeli army. The SNHR likewise claimed impartiality in June 2021 when it attributed 200,209 civilian deaths to the Syrian regime and pro-regime groups, including Iranian militias, 5,043 to ISIS, 4,164 to opposition factions and 1,284 to Kurdish forces. The discrepancies in these estimates stem from the need to obtain evidence or witness statements to confirm whether, and how many, deaths occurred.

Le Monde Diplomatique




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Qarmatians (Al-Qaramita)

By Nadeem Mahjoub Documentary film-makers G. Troeller and M. C. Defarge once asked a cabinet minister in South Yemen, why socialistic ideas were so readily acceptable in that part of the Arab world. He replied: “Because we have been communists for a thousand years! My mother was Qarmatian.” Official Muslim scholars and clerics, and many so-called moderates (whether individuals or groups) oppose sedition ( fitna ). Tensions and contradictions in society should be solved peacefully and even if the ruler was unjust and impious, it is generally accepted he should still be obeyed, for any kind of order is better than anarchy and sedition. “The tyranny of a sultan for a hundred years causes less damage than one year’s tyranny exercised by the subjects against one another.” Revolt was justified only against a ruler who clearly went against the command of God and His prophet.” 1 Here we look at not what happened in the minds of people who call for calm, oppose dissent and preach the re...
"A second position argues against transition, which is transitology itself. It is well known—especially among economists—as the sudden mobilization of a considerable mass of experts who are generally foreigners,generally Western, who come to preach the good word and to propose ready-made models of democracy. The science of the transition has become a financial windfall, a market. And the word transition has of course become a reflex of language, a term of reference, a call for tenders ( appel d’offres ) to which the whole society was supposed to respond.  Consequently, the reticence that one can express is the following: our history is framed, transition is a heteronomy. Every democratic revolution is henceforth supposed to take a unique, imposed path, which is, at the same time, indistinctly democratic and liberal (or neoliberal). A more or less non-“negotiable” package.  It is necessary to highlight the imposed character (and imposed from the outside) of this coming to t...

UK

"We are all in it together" A letter from a doctor to Boris Johnson published a few months ago: ' Johnson has contributed to thousands of deaths ' Related 'The greatest global science failure for a generation' 'Herd immunity' or lockdown

Ursula Le Guin on Capitalism

I think hard times are coming, when we will be wanting the voices of writers who can see alternatives to how we live now, and can see through our fear-stricken society and its obsessive technologies, to other ways of being. And even imagine some real grounds for hope. We will need writers who can remember freedom: poets, visionaries— the realists of a larger reality . Right now, I think we need writers who know the difference between production of a market commodity and the practice of an art. The profit motive is often in conflict with the aims of art.  We live in capitalism. Its power seems inescapable; so did the divine right of kings.  … Power can be resisted and changed by human beings; resistance and change often begin in art, and very often in our art—the art of words. I’ve had a long career and a good one, in good company, and here, at the end of it, I really don’t want to watch American literature get sold down the river. ...  The name of our beautiful reward is ...

Women and Sex Work in Syria, Tunisia, Morocco and the West

 A long exchange How much is the condition of syrian women changing under the new regime? The condition of Syrian women under the new transitional government following the fall of the Assad regime is changing in a highly contradictory manner, marked by  symbolic high-level appointments juxtaposed against a sharp decline in overall political representation, deteriorating legal protections, and a severe humanitarian crisis.  While the interim administration promotes an image of inclusivity, women’s rights groups and activists express deep concern over an increasingly patriarchal and conservative political environment.  [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]  The transition has impacted Syrian women across several distinct areas: 📉 Declining Political Representation Marginal Parliamentary Presence : In the transitional elections, women won just  6 out of 119 seats (roughly 4%) in the new parliament. This is a severe drop from the 10% to 13% representation they held under the Assad ...

Big Tech Takeover: Authoritarian Capture

  An article subject to subscription . Read here then continue with some excerpts below. ******** Palantir is the data backbone of the authoritarian state, and Anduril is its autonomous warfare command system, turning information dominance into automated military power. Its Lattice platform connects satellite feeds, radar data and battlefield imagery into a single operational network, allowing military missions to be planned and executed at lightning speed. The company claims its systems can function at ‘level 5 autonomy’: launching, identifying targets, striking and returning without human intervention. [Starshield, SpaceX’s of Elon Musk]  When NATO’s battlefield communications depend on infrastructure controlled by one man who openly endorses European far-right parties, defence autonomy becomes theatrical fiction. Other solutions such as GovCloud, from Amazon Web Services, or Azure Government, provided by Microsoft – in partnership with OpenAI, Meta and Anthropic – are now e...
"It is a peculiarity of capitalists and the bourgeoisie to think that we workers have no culture," adds the novelist, whose many tattoos include one of Karl Marx on his left arm. Argentine cleaner's double life as prize-winning novelist

China

This is a very engaging paper. Primitive Socialist Accumulation in China: An Alternative View on the Anomalies of Chinese 'Capitalism'