Skip to main content

Is Sudan Still a State?

“Far from being caused by personal rivalry, this conflict is rooted in the long history of the region and Sudan’s never-ending economic and social crisis.

The conflict between the North and the South claimed between half a million and a million lives from 1955 to 2002.

And herein lies the cause of the fighting tearing Sudan apart. To understand it requires going back to 2011. The secession of South Sudan and the rise of guerrilla movements within the North’s Muslim populations had weakened President Omar al-Bashir’s authority. His increasingly unpopular Islamist regime had been in power since the coup of June 1989 and was rotten with corruption.

The regime sent the Janjaweed to fight in Yemen on behalf of the Saudis – who paid handsomely – and then tasked them with repressing the northern guerrillas of the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement-North (SPLM-N), first in Darfur and then throughout the country.

From the day after the coup, there were obvious tensions between the two forces, each of which tried (unsuccessfully) to take over the democratic movement by claiming to represent popular anti-dictatorship legitimacy.

In January 2022 Washington dispatched Molly Phee, assistant secretary of state for foreign affairs, for purely symbolic talks with the new regime, thereby endorsing the coup.

So not ti disrupt gold sales to Russia, “Sudan abstained in the UN General Assembly vote condemning the invasion of Ukraine.

The regime’s ties with Russia did not prevent the US from resuming economic aid to Sudan in May 2022.

Over the years, the SAF and RSF have collaborated uneasily over the ever-shrinking pie of the Sudanese economy, which has become increasingly reliant on gold production.” Sudan is currently Africa's third producer of gold.”

The relative importance of this sector does seem real, “for gold becoming the country’s major export has had catastrophic socioeconomic effects. The squandering and concentration of income, which began during the brief oil boom (1999-2011), worsened in 2011, after South Sudan gained independence, because the main oil wells are there. Unlike oil, gold is well suited to small-scale exploitation and clandestine trade. In an uncertain security context, the bulk of Sudan’s wealth increasingly bypasses the state and falls into the military’s hands.”

Al-Burhan’s own middle-class background “seems to have predisposed him towards extremists from good families over lower-class protesters (gharraba or western scum). In Hemedti’s camp, the preferences are reversed and hostility focuses on the kozan, a derogatory term for their Islamist enemies.

The coup of 25 October 2021 halted Sudan’s democratic revolution, but on a different basis for each side. For the regular army under al-Burhan, it was as much a social issue as a political one: a large part of the working and middle classes saw 2019’s April Revolution and the elimination of Islamists as a way for Sudan to evolve towards greater social and economic justice. For Hemedti and his paramilitaries, marginalised by the Nile Valley elite, the coup was necessary to break the monopoly on power held by an Arab-speaking aristocracy since the Ottoman conquest, then perpetuated by the British and maintained by a militarised bourgeoisie since independence.

To understand the situation in Sudan, it’s worth examining the role of the UAE – which ironically has become a local vector for Russian influence – and the Emirates’ confrontation with Egypt, which represents US interests. Its shift towards greater autonomy began in the early 2000s, achieved mainly through the logistics company DP World, set up in 1999 in Dubai.

When the civil war spread nationwide in April 2023, the UAE expanded its involvement and began collaborating with the Wagner Group. Via its satellites in the Central African Republic, Wagner delivered weapons (paid for by the UAE) to the RSF amid confusion over the divisions among the Rizeigat clans. 

The death of Wagner boss Yevgeny Prigozhin further complicated matters: Vladimir Putin reorganised his militias in Africa, meaning two Russian groups competed to supply the RSF. In December the Kremlin announced the creation of the Africa Corps, which could bring together their operations. The UAE has resolved these financial and logistical uncertainties with the help of Libya’s Marshal Khalifa Haftar.

Sudan seems to be inexorably sinking into chaos. Financial support, notably the $1.4bn provided by the IMF in July 2021, has had no economic or social impact. The near-genocide of Darfur’s African populations (thousands of deaths have gone unrecorded) is no longer factored in to any political calculations.”

Extracts from Gérard Prunier’s article on Le Monde Diplomatique, March 2024

Related

The best approach I have seen so far to what is happening in Sudan.

Gunshots in Khartoum

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Qarmatians (Al-Qaramita)

By Nadeem Mahjoub Documentary film-makers G. Troeller and M. C. Defarge once asked a cabinet minister in South Yemen, why socialistic ideas were so readily acceptable in that part of the Arab world. He replied: “Because we have been communists for a thousand years! My mother was Qarmatian.” Official Muslim scholars and clerics, and many so-called moderates (whether individuals or groups) oppose sedition ( fitna ). Tensions and contradictions in society should be solved peacefully and even if the ruler was unjust and impious, it is generally accepted he should still be obeyed, for any kind of order is better than anarchy and sedition. “The tyranny of a sultan for a hundred years causes less damage than one year’s tyranny exercised by the subjects against one another.” Revolt was justified only against a ruler who clearly went against the command of God and His prophet.” 1 Here we look at not what happened in the minds of people who call for calm, oppose dissent and preach the re...
John Gray, the Guardian, 03 March 2015: "To a significant extent, the new atheism is the expression of a liberal moral panic." "There is no more reason to think science can determine human values today than there was at the time of Haeckel or Huxley. None of the divergent values that atheists have from time to time promoted has any essential connection with atheism, or with science. How could any increase in scientific knowledge validate values such as human equality and personal autonomy? The source of these values is not science. In fact, as the most widely-read atheist thinker of all time [Nietzsche] argued, these quintessential liberal values have their origins in monotheism." "The reason Nietzsche has been excluded from the mainstream of contemporary atheist thinking is that he exposed the problem atheism has with morality. It’s not that atheists can’t be moral – the subject of so many mawkish debates. The question is which morality an atheis...

Capitalism

Some of this reminds me of how five or six years ago in a class of seven students in a UK elite university three of them (two Germans and one British) were in favour of a "benevolent dictator" (in the Arab context). The bloody horrors of Pinochet showed how capitalism will react when it's threatened
Varoufakis "speaks of how great it was to have the support of Larry Summers, Norman Lamont, and other figures on the Right, but it was support for whom, for what, and in whose class interests? Class analysis is far from the foreground of the picture sketched out here. Closed rooms and class war
"A second position argues against transition, which is transitology itself. It is well known—especially among economists—as the sudden mobilization of a considerable mass of experts who are generally foreigners,generally Western, who come to preach the good word and to propose ready-made models of democracy. The science of the transition has become a financial windfall, a market. And the word transition has of course become a reflex of language, a term of reference, a call for tenders ( appel d’offres ) to which the whole society was supposed to respond.  Consequently, the reticence that one can express is the following: our history is framed, transition is a heteronomy. Every democratic revolution is henceforth supposed to take a unique, imposed path, which is, at the same time, indistinctly democratic and liberal (or neoliberal). A more or less non-“negotiable” package.  It is necessary to highlight the imposed character (and imposed from the outside) of this coming to t...
"By 2003, the Libyan government had entered into relations with the International Monetary Fund, privatizing a number of state-owned enterprises. In 2004, Libya opened up 15 new offshore and onshore blocs to drilling. Campbell also chronicles the burrowing actions of the “Western-educated bureaucrats [who] worked to bring Libya into the fold of ‘market reforms,’ and the deepening commercial relations with British capital.”  In 2007, British Petroleum inked a deal with the Libyan Investment Corporation for the exploration of 54,000 square kilometers of the Ghadames and Sirt basins. It also signed training agreements for Libyan professionals, helping create a base for neoliberalism within the government. By 2011, 2800 Libyan professionals were studying in the United Kingdom, learning “Western values” of destatization and thus the removal of the possibility for production and power to be responsive to the demands of the people.  Libya under Qadhaffi was mercurial, but against ...

Europe's Refugee Camps

"Just three and a half years after the signing of the refugee deal, these camps have become symbols of Europe's failure to protect those who knocked on its door for help. These camps, with Moria chief among them, are now places where already traumatised people are stripped off their dignity." The invisible violence of Europe's refugees camps