“Let there be no mistake: French officialdom is complicit with what is going on in Gaza.Justifying the ongoing genocide, it has given credence, along with the MPs of the ruling majority and often those of the right-wing opposition and the far right too – but also at times the left – all the arguments used to vindicate Benyamin Netanyahu’s government.
Economic sanctions, symbolic measures to remove the offending flag from the public eye, athletic boycott in view of the coming Olympics, a weapons embargo, all of these is only used against Russia.
When 35% of the country’s exports come to Europe, the use of that economic lever is not even threatened; no more than the suspension of arms deliveries, or their components (the exact value of France’s exports of these is not known) or munitions; nor the slightest attempt to make them obey international law by sanctioning the French firms present in the occupied territories, like Carrefour or Alstom.”
Yet the writers could repeat the cliché ‘international law’ without even putting it in inverted commas. Is that not meaningless?
“We must hearken to the degradation of France’s reputation in the Global South…” And when did France’s exactly have a progressive policy/interference/intervention in ‘the Global South’?
Comments