Skip to main content

Notes on Syria

In a region where colonialism, imperialism and authoritarianism are entangled in a web of interests, rebuilding Syria and developing a mass movement against Israel and US as well as an appeal to renew the spirit of 2010/2011 of overthrowing the rotten, authoritarian and crime-complicit regimes are inseparable. A ‘free Syria’ cannot be free in a sea of unfree region. 

When I posted a comment similar to the above on alquds.co.uk, replying to an article by someone defending the leader of Hay’at Tahrir al Sham’s stance on Israel, my comment about the reactionary forces involved was censored and went unpublished.

“For too long,” writes Hicham Safieddine, “the Assad regime invoked the conflict with Israel to justify its repressive measures against its people. Its opponents have long dared it to launch resistance in the Golan. Now that the opposition is in power, no such plan is in sight.” Thus fighting colonialism and authoritarianism should not be exclusive.

The current picture and new Syrian regime’s outlook say that adaptation and concessions will be the order of the day; the US, Israel, Turkey, the EU and others will be shaping the Syrian future and more; rifts between the different factions in Syria will materialise if not in the context of power sharing, it will be around Israel and the role of other foreign powers in Syria.

What do the reactionary forces have for Syria? “The new Minister of Economy affiliated with HTS reiterated this neoliberal orientation a few days after saying that ‘we will move from a socialist economy…to a free competitive economy’. Regardless of the complete fallacy of describing the previous regime as socialist, the class orientation of the minister was clearly reflected in the emphasis that ‘the private sector… will be an effective partner and contributor to building the Syrian economy’. No mention was made of workers, peasants, public state employees, or of any trade unions and professional associations in the country’s future economy.” 

The reactionary nature of the new regime is also manifested in the role of women in society. A view and position that appeals to many men in Syria, not only HTS members. Women’s roles, according to them, “must align with what women can perform. For instance, if we say that a woman should be Minister of Defence, does this align with her nature and biological makeup? Undoubtedly, it does not.”

This is a new-old material for Western liberals. While imperialist and regional forces work on coopting the new regime and setting their terms and conditions in a context of the struggle of influencing and configuring society, missionaries will be directly and indirectly supported by states that are supporting genocide in Gaza. The green light will be given by the US and its allies once they deem HTS is not ‘terrorist’ and will adhere to ‘the values of democracy and respect of human rights’ – a regime that ‘we can do business with’.

Yet it is disgusting to see some leftists, Stalinists and even marxists, focuse on the role of imperialism and ignore the brutality of the Syrian regime. The toppling of the Syrian regime by reactionary forces does not mean ignoring the freeing of prisoners from Assad’s regime dungeons and the end of one form of decades long of oppression. 

How could a revolutionary oppose capitalist and imperialist oppression, exploitation, etc. and remain silent on torture, rape and killing of activists, especially that the regime, not the Islamist groups, including ISIS, were responsible for most of the killing, torture, pain, displacement … of Syrians? 

While liberals not only ignore the structural oppression capitalism and imperialism inflict on people, but also genocide, these leftists keep silent on other forms of oppression and repression – bigger ones at times.



I completely agree with Joseph Dahr on this: “To advance demands such as democracy, social justice, equality, Kurdish self-determination, and women’s liberation in order to build solidarity among the country’s exploited and oppressed, Syria’s progressives and democrats will have to build and rebuild popular organisations from trade unions to feminist movements, community groups, and national structures to bring them together.”



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Qarmatians (Al-Qaramita)

By Nadeem Mahjoub Documentary film-makers G. Troeller and M. C. Defarge once asked a cabinet minister in South Yemen, why socialistic ideas were so readily acceptable in that part of the Arab world. He replied: “Because we have been communists for a thousand years! My mother was Qarmatian.” Official Muslim scholars and clerics, and many so-called moderates (whether individuals or groups) oppose sedition ( fitna ). Tensions and contradictions in society should be solved peacefully and even if the ruler was unjust and impious, it is generally accepted he should still be obeyed, for any kind of order is better than anarchy and sedition. “The tyranny of a sultan for a hundred years causes less damage than one year’s tyranny exercised by the subjects against one another.” Revolt was justified only against a ruler who clearly went against the command of God and His prophet.” 1 Here we look at not what happened in the minds of people who call for calm, oppose dissent and preach the re...
Post a Comment
Read more

Capitalism

Some of this reminds me of how five or six years ago in a class of seven students in a UK elite university three of them (two Germans and one British) were in favour of a "benevolent dictator" (in the Arab context). The bloody horrors of Pinochet showed how capitalism will react when it's threatened
Read more
"If you don't attack the economic power of the elite, soon or later it will attack you." That's what the Arab uprisings, for instance, were unable/failed to do. K for Karl – Revolution (episode 3)
Post a Comment
Read more
"A second position argues against transition, which is transitology itself. It is well known—especially among economists—as the sudden mobilization of a considerable mass of experts who are generally foreigners,generally Western, who come to preach the good word and to propose ready-made models of democracy. The science of the transition has become a financial windfall, a market. And the word transition has of course become a reflex of language, a term of reference, a call for tenders ( appel d’offres ) to which the whole society was supposed to respond.  Consequently, the reticence that one can express is the following: our history is framed, transition is a heteronomy. Every democratic revolution is henceforth supposed to take a unique, imposed path, which is, at the same time, indistinctly democratic and liberal (or neoliberal). A more or less non-“negotiable” package.  It is necessary to highlight the imposed character (and imposed from the outside) of this coming to t...
Post a Comment
Read more
"In the same way that Robinson [Crusoe] was able to ob­tain a sword, we can just as well suppose that [Man] Friday might appear one fine morning with a loaded revolver in his hand, and from then on the whole relationship of violence is reversed: Man Friday gives the orders and Crusoe is obliged  to work. . . . Thus, the revolver triumphs over the sword, and even the most childish believer in axioms will doubtless form the conclusion that violence is not a simple act of will, but needs for its realization certain very concrete preliminary con­ditions, and in particular the implements of violence; and the more highly developed of these implements will carry the day against primitive ones. Moreover, the very fact of the ability to produce such weapons signifies that the producer of highly developed weapons, in everyday speech the arms  manufac­turer, triumphs over the producer of primitive weapons. To put it briefly, the triumph of violence depends upon the pro­duction of a...
Post a Comment
Read more
Varoufakis "speaks of how great it was to have the support of Larry Summers, Norman Lamont, and other figures on the Right, but it was support for whom, for what, and in whose class interests? Class analysis is far from the foreground of the picture sketched out here. Closed rooms and class war
Post a Comment
Read more
Syria Despite the length of the war and the catastrophes it has brought, the deeper forces behind Syria’s conflict remain poorly understood, even on the Left. The protagonists are too often seen in the culturalist terms of “Sunnis vs. Shias,” or “Islamists vs. Secularists.” Just as often, the war is reduced to pure geopolitics, with the lead actors assumed to be mere proxies for America and its international opponents (or allies). Rarest of all is any developed discussion of the class dynamics that shaped the Syrian state and society even before the 2011 conflict. Yet these had a decisive effect on the uprising and the regime’s ability to withstand it. Grasping these social elements of the conflict is just as important today if we want to understand the Assad regime’s strategy for the “new Syria,” and how it intersects with the plans of his Russian and Syrian allies.
Post a Comment
Read more