Skip to main content

Liberals Yearning for the Good Old, Bad Old Days

“It's the end of the world. Again. Liberal-democratic Europe, having been abandoned by its American overlord, must now (so say its leaders) fulfil its destiny by vanquishing a twin-headed monster. The first head is the Trump-Putin dyad, united in their loathing of Ukraine and the European Union; and the second, the cabal of Silicon Valley predators threatening humanity.

‘The new axis of the world is Trump-Putin,’ declared Jean-Yves Le Drian.

“The essayist Giuliano da Empoli's argument in brief is that authoritarian leaders are conspiring with the all-conquering tech oligarchs to introduce ‘an era of limitless violence’. Against such opponents, ‘defenders of liberty appear singularly ill-prepared.’ His regret over this perhaps draws on personal experience; before the ‘age of predators’, there was an Edenic era of social-liberalism and the ‘third way’, whose leading lights included Matteo Renzi and Romano Prodi, both advised by da Empoli. Their brilliance so delighted Italian voters that within a few years the country became Europe’s first neo-fascist state.

“Naomi Klein and Astra Taylor painted a picture of ‘end times fascism’ sweeping through society… The only viable politics, Klein and Taylor write, is to build ‘an unruly open-hearted movement of the Earth-loving faithful: faithful to this planet, its people, its creatures and to the possibility of a liveable future for us all’.

“Such a framing undoubtedly guarantees that the vast majority of people are positioned on the ‘good’ side of the barricade – more even than the ‘99%’, whom the left so optimistically counted on in the early 2010s.

“The perception that the educated elites are inevitably linked to class privilege, contempt for ordinary people and cultural progressivism continues to weigh like a millstone round the neck of the left. By harping on about the need for manual workers to upskill (‘What you earn depends on what you learn,’ President Clinton liked to repeat) – only to then sacrifice them to offshoring – it denied non-graduates the right to a decent life and fuelled reactionary attacks on universities, institutions which are widely seen as the breeding ground for an arrogant, rootless elite.

“So do we now find ourselves in a world where Marxists and Tocquevilleans can rally together against barbarism? Earthlings unite against space monsters? Advocates of embracing the lesser evil are again calling on every faction of the left to come together under their banner to defeat Trump and his lackeys. But what’s the programme? It’s rarely wise to fight on the turf your opponent picks, but it’s even worse to be defined by them – falling into a form of unreflecting partisanship that leads to opposing everything they support and defending everything they attack. That leads to cheerleading for globalisation as a counter to Trump’s mobster protectionism; backing a war economy in support of Ukraine to counter something as welcome as US disengagement from Europe; and advocating pre-emptive censorship of digital platforms against freedom of speech and its excesses.

“And so the ad hoc alliance of the ‘least worst’ is preparing yet another great leap backward. Its supporters are already rewriting the story of the free-trade past as though it were a lost paradise (see It’s time for the Teamsters and turtles to reunite, in this issue). They miss the time when Silicon Valley, the Democrats and the Pentagon were building a surveillance society and digitising social life at breakneck speed. They mourn the decades when the US humiliated Europe (though less boorishly) through extraterritorial sanctions, data predation and industrial asset theft. Nostalgia has switched sides. Having ceded the future to its adversaries, part of the left is now convincing itself that – however bad they seemed then – things used to be so much better.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Qarmatians (Al-Qaramita)

By Nadeem Mahjoub Documentary film-makers G. Troeller and M. C. Defarge once asked a cabinet minister in South Yemen, why socialistic ideas were so readily acceptable in that part of the Arab world. He replied: “Because we have been communists for a thousand years! My mother was Qarmatian.” Official Muslim scholars and clerics, and many so-called moderates (whether individuals or groups) oppose sedition ( fitna ). Tensions and contradictions in society should be solved peacefully and even if the ruler was unjust and impious, it is generally accepted he should still be obeyed, for any kind of order is better than anarchy and sedition. “The tyranny of a sultan for a hundred years causes less damage than one year’s tyranny exercised by the subjects against one another.” Revolt was justified only against a ruler who clearly went against the command of God and His prophet.” 1 Here we look at not what happened in the minds of people who call for calm, oppose dissent and preach the re...

Capitalism

Some of this reminds me of how five or six years ago in a class of seven students in a UK elite university three of them (two Germans and one British) were in favour of a "benevolent dictator" (in the Arab context). The bloody horrors of Pinochet showed how capitalism will react when it's threatened
"If you don't attack the economic power of the elite, soon or later it will attack you." That's what the Arab uprisings, for instance, were unable/failed to do. K for Karl – Revolution (episode 3)
"A second position argues against transition, which is transitology itself. It is well known—especially among economists—as the sudden mobilization of a considerable mass of experts who are generally foreigners,generally Western, who come to preach the good word and to propose ready-made models of democracy. The science of the transition has become a financial windfall, a market. And the word transition has of course become a reflex of language, a term of reference, a call for tenders ( appel d’offres ) to which the whole society was supposed to respond.  Consequently, the reticence that one can express is the following: our history is framed, transition is a heteronomy. Every democratic revolution is henceforth supposed to take a unique, imposed path, which is, at the same time, indistinctly democratic and liberal (or neoliberal). A more or less non-“negotiable” package.  It is necessary to highlight the imposed character (and imposed from the outside) of this coming to t...
"In the same way that Robinson [Crusoe] was able to ob­tain a sword, we can just as well suppose that [Man] Friday might appear one fine morning with a loaded revolver in his hand, and from then on the whole relationship of violence is reversed: Man Friday gives the orders and Crusoe is obliged  to work. . . . Thus, the revolver triumphs over the sword, and even the most childish believer in axioms will doubtless form the conclusion that violence is not a simple act of will, but needs for its realization certain very concrete preliminary con­ditions, and in particular the implements of violence; and the more highly developed of these implements will carry the day against primitive ones. Moreover, the very fact of the ability to produce such weapons signifies that the producer of highly developed weapons, in everyday speech the arms  manufac­turer, triumphs over the producer of primitive weapons. To put it briefly, the triumph of violence depends upon the pro­duction of a...
Varoufakis "speaks of how great it was to have the support of Larry Summers, Norman Lamont, and other figures on the Right, but it was support for whom, for what, and in whose class interests? Class analysis is far from the foreground of the picture sketched out here. Closed rooms and class war

US

 Written in June: The candidate who emerged from this jumble of discontent was the man who promised to do the least. His party is now preparing to give us a national election that will be little more than a referendum on the hated Donald Trump. Finally we have a climate in which the American public would unquestionably choose dramatic change were it offered to them, and the party of change has contrived to ensure that it will not be offered. Instead our choice is between two elderly and conservative white men, both with a history of stretching the truth, both with sexual harassment accusations hanging over them, and neither representing any possibility of energetic democratic reform. The old order has been miraculously rescued once again. Such is the climate of opinion in America that, with the right leader, remarkable things would be possible. Instead we are presented with Joe Biden, an affable DC veteran with a hand in many of the defining disasters of the last 30 years: worker-c...