A good read
“In the end, Hughes argues, there can be no end to dirty work. The most urgent task for any society is not its elimination but its containment. Dirty work will continue so long as it remains in its proper place. Not here, but elsewhere; and if not entirely out of sight at least out of mind. It is only when such containment mechanisms fail, says Hughes, that a fanatical inner group threatens to form, that liberalism becomes fascism, and that something like ICE steps out of the shadows.
“To be sure, the sociological conceptualisation of dirty work does not perfectly fit Merz’s use of Drecksarbeit. Both Hughes and Press focus on dirty work as a play of visibility and invisibility that hardly seems applicable to Israel’s spectacular dirty work in Iran, Lebanon, and Gaza: two televised bombing campaigns and a genocide broadcast in real time. And there are other problems. Was Merz trying to say that Israel was acting as the bad agent of Euro-American power? Was he aiming to cleanse the image of decent Germans by off-loading the stain of violence onto an imperial client state? … Merz did not disavow and morally distance himself from the dirty work Israel is doing, but held up Israel’s actions as the epitome of courage.
“What, exactly, does Merz think Israel is doing für uns alle? And who does he think ‘we’ are? No one has approached these questions with more precision, and with more devastating rigor, than James Baldwin…”
Comments