I have read Leonardo Padura's The Man Who Loved Dogs – a great novel. I am surprised though that Padura describes Cubas as socialist – that he repeats the official line. It is another unfortunate position that does a disservice to socialism and strengthens the anti-socialist arguments: ‘Is that the socialism you want to live in?’. Over four years, 1.2 million Cubans – one tenth of the population – left the island. I have personally experienced life in two Cuban cities for six months. My answer is: No, I wouldn't live in Cuba, but I still defend the ideals of socialism and oppose the American-led imperialism against any anti-capitalist alternative. Padura admits 'the perversion of the great egalitarian utopia of the 20th century as manifested in socialist societies.’ Here is the contradiction: a 'perversion' and 'socialist society'.
'There is the productive inefficiency of its socialist, centralised economic system.' Note that Padura does never put the word socialist in inverted commas. Have not a few socialists and Marxists described 'the centralised economic system' and its 'inefficiency as a bureaucratic dictatorship that resembles the Stalinist model or state capitalism of a sort?
Comments