Skip to main content
The on-going coup in Venezuela
By Jorge Martin (Hands off Venezuela)

Even though the coup has not yet succeeded, the impression one gets is that there is an inexorable march forward in its implementation which is pushed mainly from forces abroad rather than in Venezuela itself.
There are now plenty of newspaper reports which detail the way this coup plot was hatched, in the US, with the collaboration of Marco Rubio and top Trump administration officials. The hawks now control the whole operation (having removed "moderates" like Tillerson), Pence, Pompeo, Bolton, Abrams, all of them cold war veterans committed to putting an end to anything which smells of revolution in Latin America. Meetings which have been reported go back nearly two years, but more recently, the plans around Guaidó were discussed in Washington in December, that is BEFORE he was even elected president of the national assembly. 
At a rally with reactionary Venezuelans in Florida on Feb 2, Mike Pence promised to bring "freedom" to Venezuela and then continue to Nicaragua and Cuba (https://www.whitehouse.gov/…/remarks-vice-president-pence-…/).
On Saturday, Feb 1, there were large marches in Venezuela which were useful to gauge the balance of forces as far as mass support is concerned for and against the coup.
In Caracas the chavista march was clearly larger, occupying most of Bolivar Av, and composed mostly of people from the militias and activists from the community councils and the working class neighbourhoods. A proportion of them came from outside Caracas.
The opposition march in Las Mercedes was large, but clearly smaller. Significantly they showed on stage the flags of all countries supporting self-appointed president Guaidó, including those of the US and Israel. That, the presence of US flags and symbols, was a common feature throughout opposition marches, which took place not only in Caracas but also in all main cities in the country. Overall the opposition mobilised more people, but in Caracas the chavista march was larger.
At the march Guaidó announced what is the next step of the plan: to use the cover of "humanitarian aid" to create a provocation at the border. The announcement was backed by Bolton and Pence (https://twitter.com/AmbJohnBolton/status/1091886111134236672). Three "aid" centres are going to be established, in Brazil, a yet unnamed Caribbean island and in Cucuta, Colombia. The latter is the most important one. The US will deliver "aid" there in the next few days, a week or ten days at most. Then there will be an attempt to "deliver" this aid across the border. 
We need to understand that Cucuta is the capital city of paramilitarism in Colombia, which in turn has close links with the state apparatus and the current Duque government, as well as landowners and capitalists in the Venezuelan side of the border, involved in smuggling and other illegal activities. 
There are also so-called "rebel soldiers" in Colombia which can be used for this purpose. Some of them are probably far right former Venezuelan soldiers, others are more likely to be Colombian paramilitaries in disguise. 
They have said openly that they will seek a confrontation with Venezuelan guards at the border "to see if they prevent aid from coming in or they defy Maduro's orders". This is a very dangerous adventure as in practice it amounts to an attempt to invade Venezuela under the cover of humanitarian aid and can very easily lead to an armed clash. That is what they seek. An incident which paints Maduro in bad light and justifies military intervention. 
The stakes are very high.
Also on Saturday, a serving general in the Air Force came out in support of Guaidó. This is the highest ranking serving officer to have mutinied to so far, but he had no command of troops. The Venezuelan ambassador in Iraq also defected. 
As I have explained before, the loyalty of the army high command is mostly linked to their control of the state owned companies. That means that the offer of an amnesty on the part of the coup plotters is not particularly attractive to them. However if economic sanctions get too unbearable and they see a chance of Maduro being overthrown, it is not ruled out that a section of the Army might decide that they would rather enter the scene and take over control of a "transition" process than be left out completely and lose power and wealth. 
Today 19 EU countries issued a joint statement where they "acknowledge and support Mr. Juan Guaidó, President of the democratically elected National Assembly, as President ad interim of Venezuela, in order for him to call for free, fair and democratic presidential elections." (https://www.gov.uk/governm…/…/joint-declaration-on-venezuela). At the meeting of EU FM last Thursday they couldn't get consensus (Greece, Italy and a few others opposed or abstained), so today they issued an ad-hoc statement. This is the result of the outrageous 8 day deadline for Maduro to call for elections issued by Spanish PM Sanchez. 
Sanchez's conduct has been particularly scandalous in this whole affair (as Maduro correctly pointed out in the interview he gave to Salvador, on La Sexta TV on Sunday night). After railing against Trump as a "leader of the far right we must combat" two years ago, he has now aligned himself fully with Trump's coup in Venezuela. 
Both Podemos and IU have opposed Sanchez, but the Communist Party, a key component of IU, has gone further and declared that they are breaking all contact with Sanchez. If this extends to IU then it will mean the end of the Sanchez government. 
The joint EU countries recognition for Guaidó has also created conflict in other countries. Italy has refused to sign in despite Salvini's militancy against Maduro. The M5S was against. In Austria the Foreign Minister (from the far right FPO) was against, but finally PM Kurz (OVP conservative) issued a statement backing Guaidó in very clear terms. 
Meanwhile Maduro has announced a signature collection for an open letter to Trump rejecting military intervention and for peace. While a campaign like this can be a useful tool to mobilise people, it is completely hopeless as a strategy to stop the ongoing coup.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Qarmatians (Al-Qaramita)

By Nadeem Mahjoub Documentary film-makers G. Troeller and M. C. Defarge once asked a cabinet minister in South Yemen, why socialistic ideas were so readily acceptable in that part of the Arab world. He replied: “Because we have been communists for a thousand years! My mother was Qarmatian.” Official Muslim scholars and clerics, and many so-called moderates (whether individuals or groups) oppose sedition ( fitna ). Tensions and contradictions in society should be solved peacefully and even if the ruler was unjust and impious, it is generally accepted he should still be obeyed, for any kind of order is better than anarchy and sedition. “The tyranny of a sultan for a hundred years causes less damage than one year’s tyranny exercised by the subjects against one another.” Revolt was justified only against a ruler who clearly went against the command of God and His prophet.” 1 Here we look at not what happened in the minds of people who call for calm, oppose dissent and preach the re...
"A second position argues against transition, which is transitology itself. It is well known—especially among economists—as the sudden mobilization of a considerable mass of experts who are generally foreigners,generally Western, who come to preach the good word and to propose ready-made models of democracy. The science of the transition has become a financial windfall, a market. And the word transition has of course become a reflex of language, a term of reference, a call for tenders ( appel d’offres ) to which the whole society was supposed to respond.  Consequently, the reticence that one can express is the following: our history is framed, transition is a heteronomy. Every democratic revolution is henceforth supposed to take a unique, imposed path, which is, at the same time, indistinctly democratic and liberal (or neoliberal). A more or less non-“negotiable” package.  It is necessary to highlight the imposed character (and imposed from the outside) of this coming to t...

UK

"We are all in it together" A letter from a doctor to Boris Johnson published a few months ago: ' Johnson has contributed to thousands of deaths ' Related 'The greatest global science failure for a generation' 'Herd immunity' or lockdown

Ursula Le Guin on Capitalism

I think hard times are coming, when we will be wanting the voices of writers who can see alternatives to how we live now, and can see through our fear-stricken society and its obsessive technologies, to other ways of being. And even imagine some real grounds for hope. We will need writers who can remember freedom: poets, visionaries— the realists of a larger reality . Right now, I think we need writers who know the difference between production of a market commodity and the practice of an art. The profit motive is often in conflict with the aims of art.  We live in capitalism. Its power seems inescapable; so did the divine right of kings.  … Power can be resisted and changed by human beings; resistance and change often begin in art, and very often in our art—the art of words. I’ve had a long career and a good one, in good company, and here, at the end of it, I really don’t want to watch American literature get sold down the river. ...  The name of our beautiful reward is ...

Big Tech Takeover: Authoritarian Capture

  An article subject to subscription . Read here then continue with some excerpts below. ******** Palantir is the data backbone of the authoritarian state, and Anduril is its autonomous warfare command system, turning information dominance into automated military power. Its Lattice platform connects satellite feeds, radar data and battlefield imagery into a single operational network, allowing military missions to be planned and executed at lightning speed. The company claims its systems can function at ‘level 5 autonomy’: launching, identifying targets, striking and returning without human intervention. [Starshield, SpaceX’s of Elon Musk]  When NATO’s battlefield communications depend on infrastructure controlled by one man who openly endorses European far-right parties, defence autonomy becomes theatrical fiction. Other solutions such as GovCloud, from Amazon Web Services, or Azure Government, provided by Microsoft – in partnership with OpenAI, Meta and Anthropic – are now e...

Women and Sex Work in Syria, Tunisia, Morocco and the West

 A long exchange How much is the condition of syrian women changing under the new regime? The condition of Syrian women under the new transitional government following the fall of the Assad regime is changing in a highly contradictory manner, marked by  symbolic high-level appointments juxtaposed against a sharp decline in overall political representation, deteriorating legal protections, and a severe humanitarian crisis.  While the interim administration promotes an image of inclusivity, women’s rights groups and activists express deep concern over an increasingly patriarchal and conservative political environment.  [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]  The transition has impacted Syrian women across several distinct areas: 📉 Declining Political Representation Marginal Parliamentary Presence : In the transitional elections, women won just  6 out of 119 seats (roughly 4%) in the new parliament. This is a severe drop from the 10% to 13% representation they held under the Assad ...
Charlie Hebdo criticised for calling Brussels attacks tip of Islam 'iceberg' “Such categorization of an entire community as an insidious poison is a move we have seen before.” See also Charlie Hebdo is Sadism, not Satire Shlomo Sand: 'I am not Charlie' The Red Flag and the Tricolore Le Rouge et le Tricolore
"It is a peculiarity of capitalists and the bourgeoisie to think that we workers have no culture," adds the novelist, whose many tattoos include one of Karl Marx on his left arm. Argentine cleaner's double life as prize-winning novelist