Skip to main content

Mark Twain and Orientalism

“Palestine is desolate and unlovely. And why should it be otherwise? Can the curse of the Deity beautify a land? Palestine is no more of this workday world. It is sacred to poetry and tradition - it is dreamland.” With these words Mark Twain closed his pilgrimage to Palestine, and in them can be seen the complex attitude of nineteenth-century Americans toward the Orient. For many nineteenth-century Americans, Palestine was a dreamland, a region of the world to be visited through the Bible and travel literature. The intense spiritual connection felt between Americans and the Holy Land, the idea of Palestine, would lead them to the region first as missionaries and then as tourists. Yet, to Americans, such as Twain, coming to Palestine from the western American frontier, Palestine did not compare in beauty, size, or material progress to their homeland. This comparison reflects the influence of materialism on the new wave of middle-class American travelers of which Twain was a member. The experience of Twain and his pilgrims in the Orient was also influenced by social class. Twain’s fellow pilgrims quoted sentimental authors such as William Cowper Prime because they wanted to be identified with the educated East Coast elite that Prime represented. Twain’s realist style was a counter-discourse to the sentimental writings of the East Coast, and an assertion of the superiority of American middle class views.

Twain believed that his realist style offered a clearer picture of Palestine to the American people, but clarity is perhaps the one thing that is lacking in his views on Islam and the Arab people. At certain points in Innocents Abroad, Twain writes on the ways Islam inures the Arab people to a life of poverty under an oppressive Ottoman government, while at other times, he expresses a degree of tolerance toward Muslim beliefs. Similarly, in his description of the Arabs, Twain at times advances the idea that Arab poverty is due to the Ottoman Empire, while at other times he suggests that Arabs consent to their degraded state. This ambivalence toward the Arabs and Islam is a ontinuation of earlier nineteenth-century American opinions of the Orient. In other words, Americans up to and including Twain could indulge in the fantasy of the Thousand and One Nights while still denouncing Islam and the Ottoman Empire as despotic systems antithetical to republican values.

Reading Innocents Abroad provides insights into the development of an American form of Orientalism. The United States was not a Great Power in the Orient during the nineteenth century, but its spiritual, commercial, and touristic ties with the Orient helped create a complex web of ideas and symbols associated with the East. Twain knew the powerful role travelers played in the shaping of American views of foreign lands. Travelers had the power to separate fact from fiction, but as Twain observes, they often perpetuated misconceptions and mistruths about foreign lands in their attempts to impress family and friends back home. Twain himself wanted to impress others with accounts of his travels. As a newspaper correspondent, Twain reported on those aspects of Arab society and the Ottoman Empire that he believed would sell newspapers and later books.

Scholars such as Michael Meyer and Richard Fleck have written that Twain’s focus on degradation and poverty in the Ottoman Empire was due to his concern for human welfare and dignity regardless of race or nationality.167 Despite Twain’s concerns, his negativism creates the impression that the Arabs are helpless and backward, in need of Western help or even military intervention to improve their lives. Twain’s suggestion that Islam played a role in Arab poverty added another argument to the body of thought against Islam that had been developing in America since the founding of the colonies.

As one of the most read works of travel in the United States, and Twain’s most popular work during his time, Innocents Abroad played a role in shaping the perspectives on the East of many common Americans, whom Twain’s reviewers believed would appreciate the book for its matter-of-fact style and length. In Innocents Abroad the reader can recognize the influence of social class and materialism on Twain, his pilgrims, and their experience of the Holy Land, despite Twain’s claim to write in a realistic unbiased style. These forces continue to expert an influence on American encounters with the Middle East, despite the claims to realism and objectivity made by Twain’s successors in the field of journalism. Study of Innocents Abroad not only encourages thought on American perspectives of the Orient during the late nineteenth century, but it can also stimulate thought on the factors shaping American attitudes toward the modern Middle East and what Americans may need to learn or even unlearn about it.

Source: Twain’s Geography

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Qarmatians (Al-Qaramita)

By Nadeem Mahjoub Documentary film-makers G. Troeller and M. C. Defarge once asked a cabinet minister in South Yemen, why socialistic ideas were so readily acceptable in that part of the Arab world. He replied: “Because we have been communists for a thousand years! My mother was Qarmatian.” Official Muslim scholars and clerics, and many so-called moderates (whether individuals or groups) oppose sedition ( fitna ). Tensions and contradictions in society should be solved peacefully and even if the ruler was unjust and impious, it is generally accepted he should still be obeyed, for any kind of order is better than anarchy and sedition. “The tyranny of a sultan for a hundred years causes less damage than one year’s tyranny exercised by the subjects against one another.” Revolt was justified only against a ruler who clearly went against the command of God and His prophet.” 1 Here we look at not what happened in the minds of people who call for calm, oppose dissent and preach the re...
John Gray, the Guardian, 03 March 2015: "To a significant extent, the new atheism is the expression of a liberal moral panic." "There is no more reason to think science can determine human values today than there was at the time of Haeckel or Huxley. None of the divergent values that atheists have from time to time promoted has any essential connection with atheism, or with science. How could any increase in scientific knowledge validate values such as human equality and personal autonomy? The source of these values is not science. In fact, as the most widely-read atheist thinker of all time [Nietzsche] argued, these quintessential liberal values have their origins in monotheism." "The reason Nietzsche has been excluded from the mainstream of contemporary atheist thinking is that he exposed the problem atheism has with morality. It’s not that atheists can’t be moral – the subject of so many mawkish debates. The question is which morality an atheis...

Capitalism

Some of this reminds me of how five or six years ago in a class of seven students in a UK elite university three of them (two Germans and one British) were in favour of a "benevolent dictator" (in the Arab context). The bloody horrors of Pinochet showed how capitalism will react when it's threatened
Varoufakis "speaks of how great it was to have the support of Larry Summers, Norman Lamont, and other figures on the Right, but it was support for whom, for what, and in whose class interests? Class analysis is far from the foreground of the picture sketched out here. Closed rooms and class war
"A second position argues against transition, which is transitology itself. It is well known—especially among economists—as the sudden mobilization of a considerable mass of experts who are generally foreigners,generally Western, who come to preach the good word and to propose ready-made models of democracy. The science of the transition has become a financial windfall, a market. And the word transition has of course become a reflex of language, a term of reference, a call for tenders ( appel d’offres ) to which the whole society was supposed to respond.  Consequently, the reticence that one can express is the following: our history is framed, transition is a heteronomy. Every democratic revolution is henceforth supposed to take a unique, imposed path, which is, at the same time, indistinctly democratic and liberal (or neoliberal). A more or less non-“negotiable” package.  It is necessary to highlight the imposed character (and imposed from the outside) of this coming to t...
"By 2003, the Libyan government had entered into relations with the International Monetary Fund, privatizing a number of state-owned enterprises. In 2004, Libya opened up 15 new offshore and onshore blocs to drilling. Campbell also chronicles the burrowing actions of the “Western-educated bureaucrats [who] worked to bring Libya into the fold of ‘market reforms,’ and the deepening commercial relations with British capital.”  In 2007, British Petroleum inked a deal with the Libyan Investment Corporation for the exploration of 54,000 square kilometers of the Ghadames and Sirt basins. It also signed training agreements for Libyan professionals, helping create a base for neoliberalism within the government. By 2011, 2800 Libyan professionals were studying in the United Kingdom, learning “Western values” of destatization and thus the removal of the possibility for production and power to be responsive to the demands of the people.  Libya under Qadhaffi was mercurial, but against ...

Europe's Refugee Camps

"Just three and a half years after the signing of the refugee deal, these camps have become symbols of Europe's failure to protect those who knocked on its door for help. These camps, with Moria chief among them, are now places where already traumatised people are stripped off their dignity." The invisible violence of Europe's refugees camps