Skip to main content

Age of Progress or Regression?

“Marc*: “We believe that there is no material problem … that cannot be solved by more technology. We had a problem of starvation, so we invented the Green Revolution.” 


Göran**: “Sixty years after the Green Revolution, around 733 million people were hungry and undernourished in 2023, according to the World Health Organization — an increase of 152 million since 2019.”


Marc: “We had a problem of darkness, so we invented electric lighting.” 


Göran: “Almost half of sub-Saharan Africans — 600 million — live without electricity.”


Marc: “We had a problem of cold, so we invented indoor heating.” 


Göran: “There is still a pattern of increased winter mortality in the UK.“


Marc: “We had a problem of isolation, so we invented the Internet.” 


Göran: “Social isolation remains a debilitating human condition.”


Marc: “We had a problem of pandemics, so we invented vaccines.” 


Göran: “Excess mortality as a result of COVID-19 has been found to correlate strongly with the proportion of people in poverty, with levels of GDP per capita, and with rates of income inequality.“


Marc: “We have a problem of poverty, so we invent technology to create abundance.” 


Göran: “Abundance is hardly the situation of the human majority. In short, this variety of optimism is focused only on technology as a thing, and not at all on its value as a social resource and practice.”


****

Göran: “The conventions on genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity were powerless against the postwar colonial practices of France, the UK, and the United States, from Algeria and Madagascar to Kenya and Vietnam, or against the ongoing Israeli genocide of the Palestinians.


“Israel’s genocidal war against Palestinians, with the support of the United States and its allies, combined with its insulting and humiliating defiance of the UN, including the act of declaring UNRWA, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees, a terrorist organization, indicates the beginning of a breakdown of the UN world. Israeli flaunting of international law and international courts — all made possible by Joe Biden’s protection, which Donald Trump is continuing — points to the emergence of an anarchic world patterned by imperialist geopolitics.”


*Marc Andreessen is the the prominent US venture capitalist, author of ‘The Techno-Optimist Manifesto’. Techno-Optimists believe that societies, like sharks, grow or die…. 'We believe in ambition, aggression, persistence, relentlessness — strength'. Andreessen even quotes from the Futurist Manifesto of Italian fascist Filippo Tommaso Marinetti: 'Beauty exists only in struggle. There is no masterpiece that has not an aggressive character'. Friedrich Nietzsche is another 'patron saint' of his, and 'becoming technological supermen' his big dream. Asocial technologism and fascistic aggressiveness are noteworthy opposites to caretaking cultures of social fairness, equality, and justice, and of empathy, concern, and helpfulness.”

**Göran Therborn is a sociologist and Emeritus Professor at Cambridge University, UK.


The Age of Regression – an interview with Göran Therborn for Jacobin magazine, Nº57, Spring 2025


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Qarmatians (Al-Qaramita)

By Nadeem Mahjoub Documentary film-makers G. Troeller and M. C. Defarge once asked a cabinet minister in South Yemen, why socialistic ideas were so readily acceptable in that part of the Arab world. He replied: “Because we have been communists for a thousand years! My mother was Qarmatian.” Official Muslim scholars and clerics, and many so-called moderates (whether individuals or groups) oppose sedition ( fitna ). Tensions and contradictions in society should be solved peacefully and even if the ruler was unjust and impious, it is generally accepted he should still be obeyed, for any kind of order is better than anarchy and sedition. “The tyranny of a sultan for a hundred years causes less damage than one year’s tyranny exercised by the subjects against one another.” Revolt was justified only against a ruler who clearly went against the command of God and His prophet.” 1 Here we look at not what happened in the minds of people who call for calm, oppose dissent and preach the re...

Capitalism

Some of this reminds me of how five or six years ago in a class of seven students in a UK elite university three of them (two Germans and one British) were in favour of a "benevolent dictator" (in the Arab context). The bloody horrors of Pinochet showed how capitalism will react when it's threatened
"If you don't attack the economic power of the elite, soon or later it will attack you." That's what the Arab uprisings, for instance, were unable/failed to do. K for Karl – Revolution (episode 3)
"A second position argues against transition, which is transitology itself. It is well known—especially among economists—as the sudden mobilization of a considerable mass of experts who are generally foreigners,generally Western, who come to preach the good word and to propose ready-made models of democracy. The science of the transition has become a financial windfall, a market. And the word transition has of course become a reflex of language, a term of reference, a call for tenders ( appel d’offres ) to which the whole society was supposed to respond.  Consequently, the reticence that one can express is the following: our history is framed, transition is a heteronomy. Every democratic revolution is henceforth supposed to take a unique, imposed path, which is, at the same time, indistinctly democratic and liberal (or neoliberal). A more or less non-“negotiable” package.  It is necessary to highlight the imposed character (and imposed from the outside) of this coming to t...
"In the same way that Robinson [Crusoe] was able to ob­tain a sword, we can just as well suppose that [Man] Friday might appear one fine morning with a loaded revolver in his hand, and from then on the whole relationship of violence is reversed: Man Friday gives the orders and Crusoe is obliged  to work. . . . Thus, the revolver triumphs over the sword, and even the most childish believer in axioms will doubtless form the conclusion that violence is not a simple act of will, but needs for its realization certain very concrete preliminary con­ditions, and in particular the implements of violence; and the more highly developed of these implements will carry the day against primitive ones. Moreover, the very fact of the ability to produce such weapons signifies that the producer of highly developed weapons, in everyday speech the arms  manufac­turer, triumphs over the producer of primitive weapons. To put it briefly, the triumph of violence depends upon the pro­duction of a...
Varoufakis "speaks of how great it was to have the support of Larry Summers, Norman Lamont, and other figures on the Right, but it was support for whom, for what, and in whose class interests? Class analysis is far from the foreground of the picture sketched out here. Closed rooms and class war

US

 Written in June: The candidate who emerged from this jumble of discontent was the man who promised to do the least. His party is now preparing to give us a national election that will be little more than a referendum on the hated Donald Trump. Finally we have a climate in which the American public would unquestionably choose dramatic change were it offered to them, and the party of change has contrived to ensure that it will not be offered. Instead our choice is between two elderly and conservative white men, both with a history of stretching the truth, both with sexual harassment accusations hanging over them, and neither representing any possibility of energetic democratic reform. The old order has been miraculously rescued once again. Such is the climate of opinion in America that, with the right leader, remarkable things would be possible. Instead we are presented with Joe Biden, an affable DC veteran with a hand in many of the defining disasters of the last 30 years: worker-c...