Skip to main content

Mario Vargas Llosa: Neocon with a Nobel

“The Peruvian writer Mario Vargas Llosa died on 13 April, in Lima. He was 89. Best known for his role in Latin American literature’s revival, which earned him a Nobel Prize in 2010, Vargas Llosa was also a political activist. After a brief period of communist involvement as a student, he made a U-turn and used his literary influence to mount a defence of neoliberalism. In 1990 he ran for president, and in 2021 he supported far-right candidate Keiko Fujimori against left-wing candidate Pedro Castillo.” (Le Monde Diplomatique)

Neocon with a Nobel

By Ignacio Ramonet, Le Monde Diplomatique, December 2010

In Llosa's El Sueno del Celta, the hero, Roger Casement, 1864-1916, “was an outstanding historical figure. As a British consul in Africa, he was the first to condemn, as early as 1908, the atrocities of Belgian colonialism in the Congo Free State… Vargas Llosa’s novel has rescued Casement from oblivion, as ‘one of the first Europeans to have formed a very clear idea of the nature of colonialism and its abominations’.

“Vargas Llosa, despite his opposition to indigenous movements in Latin America, shares that idea. ‘No barbarism is comparable to colonialism’, he says, blocking any debate on the ‘benefits’ of colonisation: ‘Africa has never been able to recover from its aftermath. Colonialisation has left nothing positive behind’. 

“In a manifesto supporting the Peruvian guerrilleros, Vargas Llosa said that to change things, ‘the only recourse is armed struggle’.

“He spoke of solidarity with the Cuban revolution. ‘In 10, 20 or 50 years,’ he said on 4 August 1967 in Caracas, ‘the hour of social justice will arrive in our countries, as it has in Cuba, and the whole of Latin America will have freed itself from the order that despoils it, from the forces that now insult and repress it. I hope that this hour arrives as soon as possible, and that Latin America enters, once and for all, into dignity and modern life, and that socialism will free us from our anachronism and our horror’.

In the early 1970s, his perspective was changed by The Road to Serfdom by Friedrich Hayek and The Open Society and Its Enemies by Karl Popper, especially the latter. ‘I consider Karl Popper as the most important thinker of our time. I have devoted the greater part of the two last decades to reading his work and, if I were asked to name this century’s most important philosophical book, I would not hesitate for a moment in choosing The Open Society and Its Enemies’.

He ceased to support the Cuban revolution, disowned his past as a ‘leftwing intellectual' and, with the zeal of a convert, became an ardent advocate of neoliberalism. His new heroes were Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher; she was a symbol of the 'conservative revolution' and he felt for her 'a boundless admiration and a scarcely less than filial reverence which I have never felt for any other living political leader'. Inspired by this, he moved to London, and when she was deposed in 1990, sent her flowers with the message: “Madam, there will never be enough words in the dictionary for me to thank you for what you have done for the cause of freedom’.

“The programme he proposed when he ran for the Peruvian presidency in 1990 was Thatcherite. But he was severely defeated by Alberto Fujimori. He then went into exile, and even renounced his citizenship on the pretext that Peruvians did not deserve him. He focused his admiration on José María Aznar, the neo-liberal Spanish prime minister from 1996 to 2004, an ally of George W Bush in the Iraq invasion: Aznar is now on Rupert Murdoch’s payroll at News Corporation, and has just been classified by the US magazine Foreign Policy as one of the world’s five worst leaders. Vargas Llosa thinks 'historians of the future' will recognise him as one of history’s greatest statesmen’. He also admires Nicolas Sarkozy’s 'charismatic personality' and Silvio Berlusconi’s 'outstanding political talent'. 

“Vargas Llosa has a dual personality. He can captivate readers from his first line and plunge them into breathtaking plots in which one intrigue follows another, each full of passions, humour, cruelty and eroticism. Yet the seductive mask of his novels conceals an ardent partisan who, for nearly 40 years, has spent most of his time in the spotlight, and haranguing and sermonising at international conventions, repeating his ideological credo. Vargas Llosa – active member of the Trilateral Commission, chairman of the International Liberty Foundation, recipient of the Irving Kristol Award from the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research – is a professional neo-con. He has tried to justify the 2003 invasion of Iraq and the June 2009 coup in Honduras.

“The French pro-Reagan essayist Guy Sorman said in October [2010]: ‘We often encounter each other on the same podium in Latin America, where Mario is a militant who, in France, would be labelled an 'ultra-liberal'. He has never stopped fighting Castro, Morales, Chávez, Kirchner and any programme that is the least bit social-democratic.' Vargas Llosa has insisted that he received the Nobel Prize as much for his ideas as for his skills as a writer: 'If my political opinions have been taken into account, so much the better. I’m thrilled'.”

Related

The Political Education of Mario Vargas Ilosa

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Qarmatians (Al-Qaramita)

By Nadeem Mahjoub Documentary film-makers G. Troeller and M. C. Defarge once asked a cabinet minister in South Yemen, why socialistic ideas were so readily acceptable in that part of the Arab world. He replied: “Because we have been communists for a thousand years! My mother was Qarmatian.” Official Muslim scholars and clerics, and many so-called moderates (whether individuals or groups) oppose sedition ( fitna ). Tensions and contradictions in society should be solved peacefully and even if the ruler was unjust and impious, it is generally accepted he should still be obeyed, for any kind of order is better than anarchy and sedition. “The tyranny of a sultan for a hundred years causes less damage than one year’s tyranny exercised by the subjects against one another.” Revolt was justified only against a ruler who clearly went against the command of God and His prophet.” 1 Here we look at not what happened in the minds of people who call for calm, oppose dissent and preach the re...
John Gray, the Guardian, 03 March 2015: "To a significant extent, the new atheism is the expression of a liberal moral panic." "There is no more reason to think science can determine human values today than there was at the time of Haeckel or Huxley. None of the divergent values that atheists have from time to time promoted has any essential connection with atheism, or with science. How could any increase in scientific knowledge validate values such as human equality and personal autonomy? The source of these values is not science. In fact, as the most widely-read atheist thinker of all time [Nietzsche] argued, these quintessential liberal values have their origins in monotheism." "The reason Nietzsche has been excluded from the mainstream of contemporary atheist thinking is that he exposed the problem atheism has with morality. It’s not that atheists can’t be moral – the subject of so many mawkish debates. The question is which morality an atheis...

Capitalism

Some of this reminds me of how five or six years ago in a class of seven students in a UK elite university three of them (two Germans and one British) were in favour of a "benevolent dictator" (in the Arab context). The bloody horrors of Pinochet showed how capitalism will react when it's threatened
Varoufakis "speaks of how great it was to have the support of Larry Summers, Norman Lamont, and other figures on the Right, but it was support for whom, for what, and in whose class interests? Class analysis is far from the foreground of the picture sketched out here. Closed rooms and class war
"A second position argues against transition, which is transitology itself. It is well known—especially among economists—as the sudden mobilization of a considerable mass of experts who are generally foreigners,generally Western, who come to preach the good word and to propose ready-made models of democracy. The science of the transition has become a financial windfall, a market. And the word transition has of course become a reflex of language, a term of reference, a call for tenders ( appel d’offres ) to which the whole society was supposed to respond.  Consequently, the reticence that one can express is the following: our history is framed, transition is a heteronomy. Every democratic revolution is henceforth supposed to take a unique, imposed path, which is, at the same time, indistinctly democratic and liberal (or neoliberal). A more or less non-“negotiable” package.  It is necessary to highlight the imposed character (and imposed from the outside) of this coming to t...
"By 2003, the Libyan government had entered into relations with the International Monetary Fund, privatizing a number of state-owned enterprises. In 2004, Libya opened up 15 new offshore and onshore blocs to drilling. Campbell also chronicles the burrowing actions of the “Western-educated bureaucrats [who] worked to bring Libya into the fold of ‘market reforms,’ and the deepening commercial relations with British capital.”  In 2007, British Petroleum inked a deal with the Libyan Investment Corporation for the exploration of 54,000 square kilometers of the Ghadames and Sirt basins. It also signed training agreements for Libyan professionals, helping create a base for neoliberalism within the government. By 2011, 2800 Libyan professionals were studying in the United Kingdom, learning “Western values” of destatization and thus the removal of the possibility for production and power to be responsive to the demands of the people.  Libya under Qadhaffi was mercurial, but against ...

Europe's Refugee Camps

"Just three and a half years after the signing of the refugee deal, these camps have become symbols of Europe's failure to protect those who knocked on its door for help. These camps, with Moria chief among them, are now places where already traumatised people are stripped off their dignity." The invisible violence of Europe's refugees camps