Skip to main content

UK: The Telegraph Facebook Page (9)

Luca LoBruno

Not all migration is equal. Europeans and East Asians are an economic net positive. Migration from the Muslim world is an enormous net drain economically and socially has been a catastrophe.

Ned Ma
Luca LoBruno evidence, figures, sources, not prejudices accumulated over the years. Define ‘economic catastrophy' in the 6th economy in the world. If you don't have evidence just use a laughing emoji on my comment. I will understand where you come from. Note that there is no such a thing as 'the Muslim world'.

Luca LoBruno
I said it was a social catastrophe. Eyes are ears are the evidence. 
But it’s also an economic net-negative. 61% of Bengali and Pakistani women have never worked and never intend to. But the economic downsides of Muslim immigration are the least important aspect, by some margin. Islamic migration is eating the social fabric of Europe alive.

Ned Ma
Luca LoBruno Eyes and tears are the evidence.” You are exhibiting lack of any academic or professional past or present. When dealing with such a phenomenon one has to consult books, research centres, universities, government's websites, statistics, etc. not prejudice. You are not even reflecting some self-study. Many British Muslims own and operate businesses, contributing billions of pounds to the UK economy and creating numerous jobs according to UK Parliament.
A report by Equi estimates that British Muslims contribute £70 billion annually to the UK economy through income, business activity, and charitable giving according to UK Parliament. 
https://equi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Equi-Economic-Contribution-Report.pdf
As of low unemployment and poverty among Muslims in the UK, one has to refer to the causes, i.e. the similar socio-economic background the black people have faced over decades: lack of opportunity, lack of education, descrimination, etc. that lead to marginalisation and refusal of integration. You exclude though those Muslims who are professionals in institutions, in governments, in hospitals and universities, the businesses owned by Muslims, the textile factories …the rich and the poor, etc. 
Take the 2011 riots on the UK. The London School of Economics made a long report based on research. You should read that report by an institution ranked as the dorst social science uni in Europe. Will that change your mind an iota or make you question? No. Your belief is stronger.
In France, for instance, someone with an Arab surname is likely to see their job application go straight in the bin. The unemployment of Bengali and Pakistani women is high (48%, not 61%). Have you asked yourself why? Have you done a reasearch?Some parts of Spain have unemployment of between 17-28%. One needs to look for the factors, not using the eyes. Even a child's eyes ask questions.
There is history to everything. But you are not interested in facts and haitorical reserach. You have already made up your made up your mind. Myths have been piled into your head (since you were a child): immigrants, 'Islam', 'other cultures', 'communism', and probably China too is an enemy.

Luca LoBruno
I see it as a purely risk-reward ratio in terms of migration patterns from the Islamic world. For me, and increasing numbers of Europeans, the associated risks really aren’t worth the undoubted benefits that some migrants provide economically and socially.

Ned Ma
Luca LoBruno You are not engaging, refuting facts, ignored most of my comment…you are asserting what you belief in. Again, there is no such a thing as 'the Islamic world'.

Luca LoBruno
You’re probably right. I’m strongly convinced on this subject and am not willing to change my mind at this stage of the game. I’d prefer our cultural parting to be as amicable as possible though. Have zero desire for unrest or blood lust.

Ned Ma
Luca LoBruno 'have zero desire for unrest or blood lust'. I hope so. Your first comment though reflects a person who is vulnerable to the current neo-fascist movements.

Luca LoBruno
Probably true. But I hope we can part ways peacefully. I care about European civilisation and don’t want it to be reduced to primal blood-hunts. Would be unbecoming of a noble culture. Ideal solution would be for both of us to realise this isn’t going to work and part ways, with full property recompenses.

Ned Ma
Luca LoBruno Yes, here is my last comment that I hope will make you think away from what myths you have told since school. 'European civilisation' is not just civilisation is has been both civilisation and barbarism. As a Germany philospher put it “Every document of civilisation is at the same time a document of barbarism.” "[I]n large measure," as Geoffrey Parker has observed, " 'the rise of the West' de­pended upon the exercise of force, upon the fact that the military balance between the Europeans and their adversaries overseas was steadily tilting in favour of the former;. . . [T]he key to the Westerners' success in creating the first truly global empires between 1500 and 1750 depended upon precisely those improvements in the ability to wage war which have been termed 'the military revolution.' " The expansion of the West was also facilitated by the superiority in organization, discipline, and training of its troops and subsequently by the superior weapons, transport, logistics, and medical services resulting from its leadership in the Industrial Revolution. The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion (to which few members of other civilizations were converted) but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.
—Samuel P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilisation and the Remaking of the World Order, 1996, p. 51. Think also Iraq, Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo, Vietnam, Latin America, ongoing genocide, the Belgian Congo genocide, the Holocaust, the Atlantic slave trade, Italian fascism, American racism, German Genocide in Namibia, the British gulag in Kenya, the French in Algeria….

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Qarmatians (Al-Qaramita)

By Nadeem Mahjoub Documentary film-makers G. Troeller and M. C. Defarge once asked a cabinet minister in South Yemen, why socialistic ideas were so readily acceptable in that part of the Arab world. He replied: “Because we have been communists for a thousand years! My mother was Qarmatian.” Official Muslim scholars and clerics, and many so-called moderates (whether individuals or groups) oppose sedition ( fitna ). Tensions and contradictions in society should be solved peacefully and even if the ruler was unjust and impious, it is generally accepted he should still be obeyed, for any kind of order is better than anarchy and sedition. “The tyranny of a sultan for a hundred years causes less damage than one year’s tyranny exercised by the subjects against one another.” Revolt was justified only against a ruler who clearly went against the command of God and His prophet.” 1 Here we look at not what happened in the minds of people who call for calm, oppose dissent and preach the re...
Varoufakis "speaks of how great it was to have the support of Larry Summers, Norman Lamont, and other figures on the Right, but it was support for whom, for what, and in whose class interests? Class analysis is far from the foreground of the picture sketched out here. Closed rooms and class war
"By 2003, the Libyan government had entered into relations with the International Monetary Fund, privatizing a number of state-owned enterprises. In 2004, Libya opened up 15 new offshore and onshore blocs to drilling. Campbell also chronicles the burrowing actions of the “Western-educated bureaucrats [who] worked to bring Libya into the fold of ‘market reforms,’ and the deepening commercial relations with British capital.”  In 2007, British Petroleum inked a deal with the Libyan Investment Corporation for the exploration of 54,000 square kilometers of the Ghadames and Sirt basins. It also signed training agreements for Libyan professionals, helping create a base for neoliberalism within the government. By 2011, 2800 Libyan professionals were studying in the United Kingdom, learning “Western values” of destatization and thus the removal of the possibility for production and power to be responsive to the demands of the people.  Libya under Qadhaffi was mercurial, but against ...
John Gray, the Guardian, 03 March 2015: "To a significant extent, the new atheism is the expression of a liberal moral panic." "There is no more reason to think science can determine human values today than there was at the time of Haeckel or Huxley. None of the divergent values that atheists have from time to time promoted has any essential connection with atheism, or with science. How could any increase in scientific knowledge validate values such as human equality and personal autonomy? The source of these values is not science. In fact, as the most widely-read atheist thinker of all time [Nietzsche] argued, these quintessential liberal values have their origins in monotheism." "The reason Nietzsche has been excluded from the mainstream of contemporary atheist thinking is that he exposed the problem atheism has with morality. It’s not that atheists can’t be moral – the subject of so many mawkish debates. The question is which morality an atheis...

Capitalism

Some of this reminds me of how five or six years ago in a class of seven students in a UK elite university three of them (two Germans and one British) were in favour of a "benevolent dictator" (in the Arab context). The bloody horrors of Pinochet showed how capitalism will react when it's threatened

Europe's Refugee Camps

"Just three and a half years after the signing of the refugee deal, these camps have become symbols of Europe's failure to protect those who knocked on its door for help. These camps, with Moria chief among them, are now places where already traumatised people are stripped off their dignity." The invisible violence of Europe's refugees camps
"A second position argues against transition, which is transitology itself. It is well known—especially among economists—as the sudden mobilization of a considerable mass of experts who are generally foreigners,generally Western, who come to preach the good word and to propose ready-made models of democracy. The science of the transition has become a financial windfall, a market. And the word transition has of course become a reflex of language, a term of reference, a call for tenders ( appel d’offres ) to which the whole society was supposed to respond.  Consequently, the reticence that one can express is the following: our history is framed, transition is a heteronomy. Every democratic revolution is henceforth supposed to take a unique, imposed path, which is, at the same time, indistinctly democratic and liberal (or neoliberal). A more or less non-“negotiable” package.  It is necessary to highlight the imposed character (and imposed from the outside) of this coming to t...

London

 When you own a country, you do with its wealth whatever you want while your brothers and sisters (Arabs and Muslims) from Lebanon’s “failed state” to Syrian refugees are suffering. You also stretch your arms to help reshape the geo-strategical board of the MENA region. You get support from the heart of “free market democracies” interested in selling you properties and weapons, and they protect you. An Arab revolution that does not spread to overthrow those rotten pigs and employ the Gulf resources for the majority of Arabs, cannot be called a revolution. Sheikh Khalifa’s £5bn London property empire