Skip to main content

Jordan’s War on the Muslim Brothers

Le Monde Diplomatique, June 2026

Excerpts

“The Jordanian Muslim Brotherhood’s capacity to mobilise support has prompted the regime to outlaw it.

“We only read the Quran and talk about religion, never politics.’ The weekly meetings remain legal as long as participants avoid claiming that ‘Islam is the solution’ to the crises facing the country,” the 50-something mother explained. “ This was one of the first slogans of the Muslim Brotherhood (al-Ikhwan al-Muslimin), founded in Egypt by Hassan al-Banna in 1928. Saying it now would constitute a crime in Jordan.”

“The Jordanian branch of the Brotherhood was dissolved in 2020, although it was able to continue some of its social activities. But on 23 April 2025, after the arrest of 16 people accused of planning an attack on Jordanian soil, it was banned outright and its assets confiscated, within less than ten days and without any form of trial.

“The ban was officially imposed to protect the kingdom’s security. But Assem al-Omari, the defendants’ lawyer and a specialist in political opposition cases, argued that this was ‘the result of years of political violence against the Brotherhood’, which challenges the monarchy’s right to hereditary succession.

“Leftwing activists, Islamists and journalists, almost all of them just out of prison or accused of ‘inciting discord’ or ‘undermining national unity’. The Jordanian authorities work closely with the US and Israel and, according to Omari, they have been using Hamas’s attacks on Israel ‘as a pretext to settle scores’.

“Today roughly two thirds of Jordan’s population are of Palestinian descent. The Palestinian question was therefore particularly sensitive and fuelled internal political tensions. These tensions exploded in ‘Black September’ in 1970, when the monarchy brutally suppressed protests which had erupted in the Palestinian refugee camps against the end of Jordan’s military operations in Israel.

“The Jordanian Muslim Brotherhood was in an unusual position. Though tolerated by the regime and allowed a political role, it was excluded from real power. Instead it became a powerful social force. As a recognised charitable organisation it was able to contribute to the smooth running of public services and even step in where necessary, thanks to funding from donors from across the Arab world, particularly the Gulf.

“But these tensions continued to rise. In 1986 student groups linked to the Brotherhood organised big demonstrations. Three years later, uprisings in the city of Ma’an showed how powerful the movement was among the working classes. The regime was concerned: although the Ikhwan were important for the country’s stability, their capacity to mobilise the masses posed a threat.

“A new era began when political parties were legalised in 1992. The Brotherhood established a political wing, the Islamic Action Front (IAF), which quickly became the main opposition force in parliament. But the movement’s institutionalisation was tense from the outset. From the 2000s it prioritised domestic issues over its historical commitment to anti-Zionism.

“Hana Jaber, a researcher who focuses on Jordan, points out that the regime favoured ‘low-level, discreet repression based on intimidation’: tactics like infiltration, surveillance and encouraging division were its stock in trade. The strategy was effective, and the Brotherhood became progressively weaker. A split in 2015, stoked by the authorities from behind the scenes, further undermined it.

“But Hamas’s attacks on Israel on 7 October 2023 changed all that. The genocide in Gaza has returned the Palestinian question to the forefront of public debate in Jordan. Support for Hamas – estimated at 66% of the population in 2024 – has allowed the Brotherhood to regain influence. Despite its dissolution in 2020, it began organising weekly Friday marches in Amman right after the October attacks in support of the people of Gaza. The monarchy reacted by increasing arrests.

“By criticising Jordan’s economic ties with Israel, the IAF is tapping into public anger over the devastation in Gaza. In 2024 – when the first parliamentary election after the 7 October attacks was held – the party once again became the main opposition force, increasing its seat count from 10 to 31 out of 138, a political earthquake which rattled the authorities.

According to Assem al-Omari, lawyer and a specialist in political opposition cases, “Jordan’s approach to the Brotherhood has an important international dimension. ‘The king doesn’t necessarily want to ban the IAF, but he’s under pressure from Washington.’ US support, amounting to $1.45bn per year and pledged until 2029, is essential for Jordan’s economy… The official unemployment rate has stood at 20% for over a decade, but it is 40.8% for young people… Since January 2026 the country’s tourism sector, which represents 15% of GDP, has seen a 10% drop in revenue.”

Related

Banning the Muslim Brotherhood

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Qarmatians (Al-Qaramita)

By Nadeem Mahjoub Documentary film-makers G. Troeller and M. C. Defarge once asked a cabinet minister in South Yemen, why socialistic ideas were so readily acceptable in that part of the Arab world. He replied: “Because we have been communists for a thousand years! My mother was Qarmatian.” Official Muslim scholars and clerics, and many so-called moderates (whether individuals or groups) oppose sedition ( fitna ). Tensions and contradictions in society should be solved peacefully and even if the ruler was unjust and impious, it is generally accepted he should still be obeyed, for any kind of order is better than anarchy and sedition. “The tyranny of a sultan for a hundred years causes less damage than one year’s tyranny exercised by the subjects against one another.” Revolt was justified only against a ruler who clearly went against the command of God and His prophet.” 1 Here we look at not what happened in the minds of people who call for calm, oppose dissent and preach the re...
"If you don't attack the economic power of the elite, soon or later it will attack you." That's what the Arab uprisings, for instance, were unable/failed to do. K for Karl – Revolution (episode 3)
"A second position argues against transition, which is transitology itself. It is well known—especially among economists—as the sudden mobilization of a considerable mass of experts who are generally foreigners,generally Western, who come to preach the good word and to propose ready-made models of democracy. The science of the transition has become a financial windfall, a market. And the word transition has of course become a reflex of language, a term of reference, a call for tenders ( appel d’offres ) to which the whole society was supposed to respond.  Consequently, the reticence that one can express is the following: our history is framed, transition is a heteronomy. Every democratic revolution is henceforth supposed to take a unique, imposed path, which is, at the same time, indistinctly democratic and liberal (or neoliberal). A more or less non-“negotiable” package.  It is necessary to highlight the imposed character (and imposed from the outside) of this coming to t...
"In the same way that Robinson [Crusoe] was able to ob­tain a sword, we can just as well suppose that [Man] Friday might appear one fine morning with a loaded revolver in his hand, and from then on the whole relationship of violence is reversed: Man Friday gives the orders and Crusoe is obliged  to work. . . . Thus, the revolver triumphs over the sword, and even the most childish believer in axioms will doubtless form the conclusion that violence is not a simple act of will, but needs for its realization certain very concrete preliminary con­ditions, and in particular the implements of violence; and the more highly developed of these implements will carry the day against primitive ones. Moreover, the very fact of the ability to produce such weapons signifies that the producer of highly developed weapons, in everyday speech the arms  manufac­turer, triumphs over the producer of primitive weapons. To put it briefly, the triumph of violence depends upon the pro­duction of a...

UK

"We are all in it together" A letter from a doctor to Boris Johnson published a few months ago: ' Johnson has contributed to thousands of deaths ' Related 'The greatest global science failure for a generation' 'Herd immunity' or lockdown

US

 Written in June: The candidate who emerged from this jumble of discontent was the man who promised to do the least. His party is now preparing to give us a national election that will be little more than a referendum on the hated Donald Trump. Finally we have a climate in which the American public would unquestionably choose dramatic change were it offered to them, and the party of change has contrived to ensure that it will not be offered. Instead our choice is between two elderly and conservative white men, both with a history of stretching the truth, both with sexual harassment accusations hanging over them, and neither representing any possibility of energetic democratic reform. The old order has been miraculously rescued once again. Such is the climate of opinion in America that, with the right leader, remarkable things would be possible. Instead we are presented with Joe Biden, an affable DC veteran with a hand in many of the defining disasters of the last 30 years: worker-c...

Against Authoritarianism and Neoliberalism in Venezuela

“The current confrontation in Venezuela today is not between left and right.” “We are witnessing the transition from a government with authoritarian tendencies to a dictatorial regime.” “This is not a government ‘backed’ by the military, but, as Maduro himself has said, the government is led by a ‘civilian-military-police alliance’. “Those who continue to support Maduro, including parties and movements of the Sao Paulo Forum or the spokespersons of Podemos in Spain, are causing severe damage to the left in the region and the world. They are damaging anti-capitalist struggles in the broadest sense.” The US embargo is ‘in violation of international law’. This is a useless statement repeated a million times, and it has come back again during the ongoing Israel’s genocidal war. “[A]fter the failure of the current, self-defined “socialist” governments, Venezuelan society tends to associate any reference to socialism or the left with the corruption and authoritarianism of the Maduro governme...