Skip to main content

Palestinian Elites Have Been Collaborating Against the Resistance for a Century

 Palestinian “struggle today continues to be one between a collaborationist PA and a pro-liberation resistance intent on ending settler-colonialism.”


Related

Google AI summary of the number killed, wounded or sent into exile.

The figure of 8,000 Palestinians killed in 1939 alone [as mentioned by Massad] is not historically accurate, but it closely mirrors the total estimated casualties suffered by the Palestinian Arab population across the entirety of the Great Arab Revolt (1936–1939). [1] 
Historical data from British archives, Palestinian historians, and independent researchers outline a more precise breakdown of the casualties and dynamics of this period.

Total Casualties of the Arab Revolt (1936–1939)

The Great Arab Revolt was a nationalist uprising against British colonial rule and its support for Zionist immigration. The cumulative death toll for Palestinians over the three-year uprising is generally accepted by historians to be around 5,000 to 5,032 dead. [1, 2, 3] 
Prominent Palestinian historian Walid Khalidi analyzed official British statistics and compiled the following totals for Palestinian casualties over the entire three-year period: [2] 
  • 3,832 Palestinians killed directly by British forces.
  • 1,200 Palestinians killed due to internal, intracommunal violence (fighting between rival Palestinian political factions or targeting of suspected collaborators).
  • 14,760 Palestinians wounded.
  • 5,600+ Palestinians imprisoned or sent into exile. [2, 4, 5, 6] 
If combining the total number of dead and heavily wounded across the multi-year revolt, the number far exceeds 8,000. However, looking strictly at fatalities occurring solely within the year 1939, the number is significantly lower, as the British military effectively crushed the core of the rebellion by the summer of 1939. [2, 6, 7, 8, 9] 

Responsibility for the Casualties

The fatalities during this period were caused by three primary factors: [9, 10] 
  • British Military Suppression: The overwhelming majority of Palestinian casualties were inflicted by the British Army and mandatory police forces. To suppress the revolt, the British deployed over 20,000 troops and utilized harsh tactics. This included aerial bombardment, collective punishment of entire villages, home demolitions, martial law, and widespread executions. [2, 8, 11] 
  • Zionist Paramilitary Forces: Pre-state Zionist militias, such as the Haganah, frequently cooperated with British forces to guard settlements and infrastructure. The British also helped train specialized joint units like the Special Night Squads. Concurrently, more extremist right-wing Zionist underground groups like the Irgun (Etzel) launched independent campaigns, detonating bombs in crowded Arab marketplaces and civilian areas, killing several hundred Palestinian civilians. [1, 4, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16] 
  • Intracommunal Fractures: In its final stages, the rebellion suffered severe internal divisions. Clashes broke out between elite families (such as the Husseinis and the Nashashibis), as well as targeted assassinations against Palestinians who advocated for cooperation with the British administration. [3, 15] 

The Impact of 1939

By the time the revolt concluded in late 1939, it had a devastating demographic effect on the Palestinian population: estimates suggest that up to 10% of the adult male Palestinian Arab population had been killed, wounded, jailed, or exiled. [12, 17] 
In an attempt to appease Arab anger and stabilize the region on the eve of World War II, the British issued the White Paper of 1939. This policy severely restricted Jewish immigration and land purchases, which ultimately turned Zionist paramilitary groups directly against the British administration in the years that followed. [18, 19, 20] 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Qarmatians (Al-Qaramita)

By Nadeem Mahjoub Documentary film-makers G. Troeller and M. C. Defarge once asked a cabinet minister in South Yemen, why socialistic ideas were so readily acceptable in that part of the Arab world. He replied: “Because we have been communists for a thousand years! My mother was Qarmatian.” Official Muslim scholars and clerics, and many so-called moderates (whether individuals or groups) oppose sedition ( fitna ). Tensions and contradictions in society should be solved peacefully and even if the ruler was unjust and impious, it is generally accepted he should still be obeyed, for any kind of order is better than anarchy and sedition. “The tyranny of a sultan for a hundred years causes less damage than one year’s tyranny exercised by the subjects against one another.” Revolt was justified only against a ruler who clearly went against the command of God and His prophet.” 1 Here we look at not what happened in the minds of people who call for calm, oppose dissent and preach the re...
"A second position argues against transition, which is transitology itself. It is well known—especially among economists—as the sudden mobilization of a considerable mass of experts who are generally foreigners,generally Western, who come to preach the good word and to propose ready-made models of democracy. The science of the transition has become a financial windfall, a market. And the word transition has of course become a reflex of language, a term of reference, a call for tenders ( appel d’offres ) to which the whole society was supposed to respond.  Consequently, the reticence that one can express is the following: our history is framed, transition is a heteronomy. Every democratic revolution is henceforth supposed to take a unique, imposed path, which is, at the same time, indistinctly democratic and liberal (or neoliberal). A more or less non-“negotiable” package.  It is necessary to highlight the imposed character (and imposed from the outside) of this coming to t...

UK

"We are all in it together" A letter from a doctor to Boris Johnson published a few months ago: ' Johnson has contributed to thousands of deaths ' Related 'The greatest global science failure for a generation' 'Herd immunity' or lockdown

Finance

"The hegemony of finance—the most fetishized form of wealth—is only maintained by the public authorities’ unconditional support. Left to itself, fictitious capital would collapse; and yet would pull down the whole of our economies in its wake. In truth, finance is a master blackmailer. Financial hegemony dresses up in the liberal trappings of the market, yet captures the old sovereignty of the state all the better to squeeze the body of society to feed its own profits. " (my emphasis) —Cédric Durand, Ficticious Capital , 2017, p. 155 

Against Authoritarianism and Neoliberalism in Venezuela

“The current confrontation in Venezuela today is not between left and right.” “We are witnessing the transition from a government with authoritarian tendencies to a dictatorial regime.” “This is not a government ‘backed’ by the military, but, as Maduro himself has said, the government is led by a ‘civilian-military-police alliance’. “Those who continue to support Maduro, including parties and movements of the Sao Paulo Forum or the spokespersons of Podemos in Spain, are causing severe damage to the left in the region and the world. They are damaging anti-capitalist struggles in the broadest sense.” The US embargo is ‘in violation of international law’. This is a useless statement repeated a million times, and it has come back again during the ongoing Israel’s genocidal war. “[A]fter the failure of the current, self-defined “socialist” governments, Venezuelan society tends to associate any reference to socialism or the left with the corruption and authoritarianism of the Maduro governme...