Skip to main content

Palestinian Elites Have Been Collaborating Against the Resistance for a Century

 Palestinian “struggle today continues to be one between a collaborationist PA and a pro-liberation resistance intent on ending settler-colonialism.”


Related

Google AI summary of the number killed, wounded or sent into exile.

The figure of 8,000 Palestinians killed in 1939 alone [as mentioned by Massad] is not historically accurate, but it closely mirrors the total estimated casualties suffered by the Palestinian Arab population across the entirety of the Great Arab Revolt (1936–1939). [1] 
Historical data from British archives, Palestinian historians, and independent researchers outline a more precise breakdown of the casualties and dynamics of this period.

Total Casualties of the Arab Revolt (1936–1939)

The Great Arab Revolt was a nationalist uprising against British colonial rule and its support for Zionist immigration. The cumulative death toll for Palestinians over the three-year uprising is generally accepted by historians to be around 5,000 to 5,032 dead. [1, 2, 3] 
Prominent Palestinian historian Walid Khalidi analyzed official British statistics and compiled the following totals for Palestinian casualties over the entire three-year period: [2] 
  • 3,832 Palestinians killed directly by British forces.
  • 1,200 Palestinians killed due to internal, intracommunal violence (fighting between rival Palestinian political factions or targeting of suspected collaborators).
  • 14,760 Palestinians wounded.
  • 5,600+ Palestinians imprisoned or sent into exile. [2, 4, 5, 6] 
If combining the total number of dead and heavily wounded across the multi-year revolt, the number far exceeds 8,000. However, looking strictly at fatalities occurring solely within the year 1939, the number is significantly lower, as the British military effectively crushed the core of the rebellion by the summer of 1939. [2, 6, 7, 8, 9] 

Responsibility for the Casualties

The fatalities during this period were caused by three primary factors: [9, 10] 
  • British Military Suppression: The overwhelming majority of Palestinian casualties were inflicted by the British Army and mandatory police forces. To suppress the revolt, the British deployed over 20,000 troops and utilized harsh tactics. This included aerial bombardment, collective punishment of entire villages, home demolitions, martial law, and widespread executions. [2, 8, 11] 
  • Zionist Paramilitary Forces: Pre-state Zionist militias, such as the Haganah, frequently cooperated with British forces to guard settlements and infrastructure. The British also helped train specialized joint units like the Special Night Squads. Concurrently, more extremist right-wing Zionist underground groups like the Irgun (Etzel) launched independent campaigns, detonating bombs in crowded Arab marketplaces and civilian areas, killing several hundred Palestinian civilians. [1, 4, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16] 
  • Intracommunal Fractures: In its final stages, the rebellion suffered severe internal divisions. Clashes broke out between elite families (such as the Husseinis and the Nashashibis), as well as targeted assassinations against Palestinians who advocated for cooperation with the British administration. [3, 15] 

The Impact of 1939

By the time the revolt concluded in late 1939, it had a devastating demographic effect on the Palestinian population: estimates suggest that up to 10% of the adult male Palestinian Arab population had been killed, wounded, jailed, or exiled. [12, 17] 
In an attempt to appease Arab anger and stabilize the region on the eve of World War II, the British issued the White Paper of 1939. This policy severely restricted Jewish immigration and land purchases, which ultimately turned Zionist paramilitary groups directly against the British administration in the years that followed. [18, 19, 20] 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Qarmatians (Al-Qaramita)

By Nadeem Mahjoub Documentary film-makers G. Troeller and M. C. Defarge once asked a cabinet minister in South Yemen, why socialistic ideas were so readily acceptable in that part of the Arab world. He replied: “Because we have been communists for a thousand years! My mother was Qarmatian.” Official Muslim scholars and clerics, and many so-called moderates (whether individuals or groups) oppose sedition ( fitna ). Tensions and contradictions in society should be solved peacefully and even if the ruler was unjust and impious, it is generally accepted he should still be obeyed, for any kind of order is better than anarchy and sedition. “The tyranny of a sultan for a hundred years causes less damage than one year’s tyranny exercised by the subjects against one another.” Revolt was justified only against a ruler who clearly went against the command of God and His prophet.” 1 Here we look at not what happened in the minds of people who call for calm, oppose dissent and preach the re...
Post a Comment
Read more
"If you don't attack the economic power of the elite, soon or later it will attack you." That's what the Arab uprisings, for instance, were unable/failed to do. K for Karl – Revolution (episode 3)
Post a Comment
Read more
"A second position argues against transition, which is transitology itself. It is well known—especially among economists—as the sudden mobilization of a considerable mass of experts who are generally foreigners,generally Western, who come to preach the good word and to propose ready-made models of democracy. The science of the transition has become a financial windfall, a market. And the word transition has of course become a reflex of language, a term of reference, a call for tenders ( appel d’offres ) to which the whole society was supposed to respond.  Consequently, the reticence that one can express is the following: our history is framed, transition is a heteronomy. Every democratic revolution is henceforth supposed to take a unique, imposed path, which is, at the same time, indistinctly democratic and liberal (or neoliberal). A more or less non-“negotiable” package.  It is necessary to highlight the imposed character (and imposed from the outside) of this coming to t...
Post a Comment
Read more
"In the same way that Robinson [Crusoe] was able to ob­tain a sword, we can just as well suppose that [Man] Friday might appear one fine morning with a loaded revolver in his hand, and from then on the whole relationship of violence is reversed: Man Friday gives the orders and Crusoe is obliged  to work. . . . Thus, the revolver triumphs over the sword, and even the most childish believer in axioms will doubtless form the conclusion that violence is not a simple act of will, but needs for its realization certain very concrete preliminary con­ditions, and in particular the implements of violence; and the more highly developed of these implements will carry the day against primitive ones. Moreover, the very fact of the ability to produce such weapons signifies that the producer of highly developed weapons, in everyday speech the arms  manufac­turer, triumphs over the producer of primitive weapons. To put it briefly, the triumph of violence depends upon the pro­duction of a...
Post a Comment
Read more

UK

"We are all in it together" A letter from a doctor to Boris Johnson published a few months ago: ' Johnson has contributed to thousands of deaths ' Related 'The greatest global science failure for a generation' 'Herd immunity' or lockdown
Read more

US

 Written in June: The candidate who emerged from this jumble of discontent was the man who promised to do the least. His party is now preparing to give us a national election that will be little more than a referendum on the hated Donald Trump. Finally we have a climate in which the American public would unquestionably choose dramatic change were it offered to them, and the party of change has contrived to ensure that it will not be offered. Instead our choice is between two elderly and conservative white men, both with a history of stretching the truth, both with sexual harassment accusations hanging over them, and neither representing any possibility of energetic democratic reform. The old order has been miraculously rescued once again. Such is the climate of opinion in America that, with the right leader, remarkable things would be possible. Instead we are presented with Joe Biden, an affable DC veteran with a hand in many of the defining disasters of the last 30 years: worker-c...
Post a Comment
Read more