Skip to main content

Britain

 Jeremy Corbyn: Seize the time!

John Molyneux, 29 October 2020

Today’s suspension of Jeremy Corbyn by Keir Starmer  is outrageous but it is also the culmination of a long process that began the moment Corbyn was elected as leader of the Labour Party. From the very first day the British political establishment, led by David Cameron and supported by most of the mainstream media and a considerable section of the Parliamentary Labour Party, set out to discredit and destroy him. 

This project had nothing to do with Corbyn’s personal strengths or weaknesses and absolutely nothing to do with anti-semitism,  real or alleged.  The motive was simple and obvious: from the outset they perceived Corbyn and especially those who supported him and were mobilized by him as a threat to their interests, precisely because he had a long record as a socialist, as an anti-racist campaigner, as a defender of workers’ rights and, particularly, as an opponent of war and British imperialism. The last they found especially unacceptable. 

It was always very important to the British ruling class that they  should be able, when push came to shove,  to rely on the Labour Party leadership to be ‘loyal’ to the British state, ie their state, and by and large that was the case.  It was the case in 1914 when most of them supported the imperialist slaughter of World  War 1; it was the case even in 1945-50 when the Attlee Government aligned with the US in the Cold War and (secretly)built the atom bomb; it was the case with Gaitskell when he ‘fought, fought, and fought again’ to stop the Labour Party backing CND, with Neil Kinnock when he abandoned the miners in 1984, with Blair on Iraq and down the line. With Corbyn they  believed he was unreliable and so every kind of mud should be slung at him to undermine and delegitimise him and almost all the media collaborated. 

At first they used traditional red scare stuff and had been done before with Tony Benn in the 1980s. When this didn’t work and Corbyn was re-elected and easily defeated the challenge of Owen Smith, and also polled well in the 2017 General Election they had to come up with something else. What they came up with was equating anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism which enabled them to depict the Labour Party as riddled with anti-Semitism because it had some high profile defenders of Palestinian rights, including Corbyn himself, and this was relentlessly pursued and weaponised. 

There were a number of factors that made this weapon effective. First it enlisted the support of the Israeli State (and therefore the Jewish Board of Deputies) which possesses a very effective propaganda machine. Second, a crucial role was played by certain right wing Zionists in the Labour Party, like Margaret Hodge, who were more than happy to mortally damage the Labour Party to defend Israel and get at Corbyn. Third, they could exploit the fact that in a mass party like the Labour Party it was inevitable that there would be certain instances of real anti-Semitism,  especially as the level of political education in the Labour Party is not high, even though the number would be much less than in the Tory Party. Fourth, that same low level of political education in the Party meant that there was not a high degree of understanding of the Palestine issue among many members who were thus not clear what was going on and how to resist it. 

As I said at the start what happened today is the culmination of this. However, it also raises fundamental questions about the structure and perspectives of the Labour Party. For more than a hundred years the Labour Party has been sustained by working class and left activists who have said to themselves they were staying in to fight to change the party. In reality the Party has absorbed all this support and all these efforts while maintaining built in structures like the dominance of the parliamentary party and the power of the trade union leaders which have always been able to block and sabotage real change.  Time and again this loyalty has been exploited to prevent anything better emerging and time and again the opportunity to create a real party of the left has been missed in the name of loyalty and the need to ‘unite’ ie surrender to the right, to win the next election. But winning the election with a Blairite or Starmerite party doesn’t achieve anything- it just produces a Tory government Mark 2. 

Of course many who joined to support Corbyn will be disillusioned and will now leave in disgust and they are right to do so. But surely there is a responsibility on the leaders of the Left, particularly the trade union leaders who consider themselves socialists and have real resources at their disposal, to make stand. Now, if ever, is the moment, for them to come together and offer something better, a real party of the left, to all those rank and file members and activists instead of leaving them to drift into disillusioned passivity. 

Such a party would be able to reach out to millions of working people and mobilise the huge anger against the Tories over the Covid shambles, poverty and inequality, the NHS, racism and refugees, the climate and a multitude of other issues. If not now, when? Seize the time!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Qarmatians (Al-Qaramita)

By Nadeem Mahjoub Documentary film-makers G. Troeller and M. C. Defarge once asked a cabinet minister in South Yemen, why socialistic ideas were so readily acceptable in that part of the Arab world. He replied: “Because we have been communists for a thousand years! My mother was Qarmatian.” Official Muslim scholars and clerics, and many so-called moderates (whether individuals or groups) oppose sedition ( fitna ). Tensions and contradictions in society should be solved peacefully and even if the ruler was unjust and impious, it is generally accepted he should still be obeyed, for any kind of order is better than anarchy and sedition. “The tyranny of a sultan for a hundred years causes less damage than one year’s tyranny exercised by the subjects against one another.” Revolt was justified only against a ruler who clearly went against the command of God and His prophet.” 1 Here we look at not what happened in the minds of people who call for calm, oppose dissent and preach the re...
John Gray, the Guardian, 03 March 2015: "To a significant extent, the new atheism is the expression of a liberal moral panic." "There is no more reason to think science can determine human values today than there was at the time of Haeckel or Huxley. None of the divergent values that atheists have from time to time promoted has any essential connection with atheism, or with science. How could any increase in scientific knowledge validate values such as human equality and personal autonomy? The source of these values is not science. In fact, as the most widely-read atheist thinker of all time [Nietzsche] argued, these quintessential liberal values have their origins in monotheism." "The reason Nietzsche has been excluded from the mainstream of contemporary atheist thinking is that he exposed the problem atheism has with morality. It’s not that atheists can’t be moral – the subject of so many mawkish debates. The question is which morality an atheis...

Capitalism

Some of this reminds me of how five or six years ago in a class of seven students in a UK elite university three of them (two Germans and one British) were in favour of a "benevolent dictator" (in the Arab context). The bloody horrors of Pinochet showed how capitalism will react when it's threatened
Varoufakis "speaks of how great it was to have the support of Larry Summers, Norman Lamont, and other figures on the Right, but it was support for whom, for what, and in whose class interests? Class analysis is far from the foreground of the picture sketched out here. Closed rooms and class war
"A second position argues against transition, which is transitology itself. It is well known—especially among economists—as the sudden mobilization of a considerable mass of experts who are generally foreigners,generally Western, who come to preach the good word and to propose ready-made models of democracy. The science of the transition has become a financial windfall, a market. And the word transition has of course become a reflex of language, a term of reference, a call for tenders ( appel d’offres ) to which the whole society was supposed to respond.  Consequently, the reticence that one can express is the following: our history is framed, transition is a heteronomy. Every democratic revolution is henceforth supposed to take a unique, imposed path, which is, at the same time, indistinctly democratic and liberal (or neoliberal). A more or less non-“negotiable” package.  It is necessary to highlight the imposed character (and imposed from the outside) of this coming to t...
"By 2003, the Libyan government had entered into relations with the International Monetary Fund, privatizing a number of state-owned enterprises. In 2004, Libya opened up 15 new offshore and onshore blocs to drilling. Campbell also chronicles the burrowing actions of the “Western-educated bureaucrats [who] worked to bring Libya into the fold of ‘market reforms,’ and the deepening commercial relations with British capital.”  In 2007, British Petroleum inked a deal with the Libyan Investment Corporation for the exploration of 54,000 square kilometers of the Ghadames and Sirt basins. It also signed training agreements for Libyan professionals, helping create a base for neoliberalism within the government. By 2011, 2800 Libyan professionals were studying in the United Kingdom, learning “Western values” of destatization and thus the removal of the possibility for production and power to be responsive to the demands of the people.  Libya under Qadhaffi was mercurial, but against ...

Europe's Refugee Camps

"Just three and a half years after the signing of the refugee deal, these camps have become symbols of Europe's failure to protect those who knocked on its door for help. These camps, with Moria chief among them, are now places where already traumatised people are stripped off their dignity." The invisible violence of Europe's refugees camps