Skip to main content

Britain

 Jeremy Corbyn: Seize the time!

John Molyneux, 29 October 2020

Today’s suspension of Jeremy Corbyn by Keir Starmer  is outrageous but it is also the culmination of a long process that began the moment Corbyn was elected as leader of the Labour Party. From the very first day the British political establishment, led by David Cameron and supported by most of the mainstream media and a considerable section of the Parliamentary Labour Party, set out to discredit and destroy him. 

This project had nothing to do with Corbyn’s personal strengths or weaknesses and absolutely nothing to do with anti-semitism,  real or alleged.  The motive was simple and obvious: from the outset they perceived Corbyn and especially those who supported him and were mobilized by him as a threat to their interests, precisely because he had a long record as a socialist, as an anti-racist campaigner, as a defender of workers’ rights and, particularly, as an opponent of war and British imperialism. The last they found especially unacceptable. 

It was always very important to the British ruling class that they  should be able, when push came to shove,  to rely on the Labour Party leadership to be ‘loyal’ to the British state, ie their state, and by and large that was the case.  It was the case in 1914 when most of them supported the imperialist slaughter of World  War 1; it was the case even in 1945-50 when the Attlee Government aligned with the US in the Cold War and (secretly)built the atom bomb; it was the case with Gaitskell when he ‘fought, fought, and fought again’ to stop the Labour Party backing CND, with Neil Kinnock when he abandoned the miners in 1984, with Blair on Iraq and down the line. With Corbyn they  believed he was unreliable and so every kind of mud should be slung at him to undermine and delegitimise him and almost all the media collaborated. 

At first they used traditional red scare stuff and had been done before with Tony Benn in the 1980s. When this didn’t work and Corbyn was re-elected and easily defeated the challenge of Owen Smith, and also polled well in the 2017 General Election they had to come up with something else. What they came up with was equating anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism which enabled them to depict the Labour Party as riddled with anti-Semitism because it had some high profile defenders of Palestinian rights, including Corbyn himself, and this was relentlessly pursued and weaponised. 

There were a number of factors that made this weapon effective. First it enlisted the support of the Israeli State (and therefore the Jewish Board of Deputies) which possesses a very effective propaganda machine. Second, a crucial role was played by certain right wing Zionists in the Labour Party, like Margaret Hodge, who were more than happy to mortally damage the Labour Party to defend Israel and get at Corbyn. Third, they could exploit the fact that in a mass party like the Labour Party it was inevitable that there would be certain instances of real anti-Semitism,  especially as the level of political education in the Labour Party is not high, even though the number would be much less than in the Tory Party. Fourth, that same low level of political education in the Party meant that there was not a high degree of understanding of the Palestine issue among many members who were thus not clear what was going on and how to resist it. 

As I said at the start what happened today is the culmination of this. However, it also raises fundamental questions about the structure and perspectives of the Labour Party. For more than a hundred years the Labour Party has been sustained by working class and left activists who have said to themselves they were staying in to fight to change the party. In reality the Party has absorbed all this support and all these efforts while maintaining built in structures like the dominance of the parliamentary party and the power of the trade union leaders which have always been able to block and sabotage real change.  Time and again this loyalty has been exploited to prevent anything better emerging and time and again the opportunity to create a real party of the left has been missed in the name of loyalty and the need to ‘unite’ ie surrender to the right, to win the next election. But winning the election with a Blairite or Starmerite party doesn’t achieve anything- it just produces a Tory government Mark 2. 

Of course many who joined to support Corbyn will be disillusioned and will now leave in disgust and they are right to do so. But surely there is a responsibility on the leaders of the Left, particularly the trade union leaders who consider themselves socialists and have real resources at their disposal, to make stand. Now, if ever, is the moment, for them to come together and offer something better, a real party of the left, to all those rank and file members and activists instead of leaving them to drift into disillusioned passivity. 

Such a party would be able to reach out to millions of working people and mobilise the huge anger against the Tories over the Covid shambles, poverty and inequality, the NHS, racism and refugees, the climate and a multitude of other issues. If not now, when? Seize the time!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Qarmatians (Al-Qaramita)

By Nadeem Mahjoub Documentary film-makers G. Troeller and M. C. Defarge once asked a cabinet minister in South Yemen, why socialistic ideas were so readily acceptable in that part of the Arab world. He replied: “Because we have been communists for a thousand years! My mother was Qarmatian.” Official Muslim scholars and clerics, and many so-called moderates (whether individuals or groups) oppose sedition ( fitna ). Tensions and contradictions in society should be solved peacefully and even if the ruler was unjust and impious, it is generally accepted he should still be obeyed, for any kind of order is better than anarchy and sedition. “The tyranny of a sultan for a hundred years causes less damage than one year’s tyranny exercised by the subjects against one another.” Revolt was justified only against a ruler who clearly went against the command of God and His prophet.” 1 Here we look at not what happened in the minds of people who call for calm, oppose dissent and preach the re...
"If you don't attack the economic power of the elite, soon or later it will attack you." That's what the Arab uprisings, for instance, were unable/failed to do. K for Karl – Revolution (episode 3)
"A second position argues against transition, which is transitology itself. It is well known—especially among economists—as the sudden mobilization of a considerable mass of experts who are generally foreigners,generally Western, who come to preach the good word and to propose ready-made models of democracy. The science of the transition has become a financial windfall, a market. And the word transition has of course become a reflex of language, a term of reference, a call for tenders ( appel d’offres ) to which the whole society was supposed to respond.  Consequently, the reticence that one can express is the following: our history is framed, transition is a heteronomy. Every democratic revolution is henceforth supposed to take a unique, imposed path, which is, at the same time, indistinctly democratic and liberal (or neoliberal). A more or less non-“negotiable” package.  It is necessary to highlight the imposed character (and imposed from the outside) of this coming to t...
"In the same way that Robinson [Crusoe] was able to ob­tain a sword, we can just as well suppose that [Man] Friday might appear one fine morning with a loaded revolver in his hand, and from then on the whole relationship of violence is reversed: Man Friday gives the orders and Crusoe is obliged  to work. . . . Thus, the revolver triumphs over the sword, and even the most childish believer in axioms will doubtless form the conclusion that violence is not a simple act of will, but needs for its realization certain very concrete preliminary con­ditions, and in particular the implements of violence; and the more highly developed of these implements will carry the day against primitive ones. Moreover, the very fact of the ability to produce such weapons signifies that the producer of highly developed weapons, in everyday speech the arms  manufac­turer, triumphs over the producer of primitive weapons. To put it briefly, the triumph of violence depends upon the pro­duction of a...

UK

"We are all in it together" A letter from a doctor to Boris Johnson published a few months ago: ' Johnson has contributed to thousands of deaths ' Related 'The greatest global science failure for a generation' 'Herd immunity' or lockdown

US

 Written in June: The candidate who emerged from this jumble of discontent was the man who promised to do the least. His party is now preparing to give us a national election that will be little more than a referendum on the hated Donald Trump. Finally we have a climate in which the American public would unquestionably choose dramatic change were it offered to them, and the party of change has contrived to ensure that it will not be offered. Instead our choice is between two elderly and conservative white men, both with a history of stretching the truth, both with sexual harassment accusations hanging over them, and neither representing any possibility of energetic democratic reform. The old order has been miraculously rescued once again. Such is the climate of opinion in America that, with the right leader, remarkable things would be possible. Instead we are presented with Joe Biden, an affable DC veteran with a hand in many of the defining disasters of the last 30 years: worker-c...

Against Authoritarianism and Neoliberalism in Venezuela

“The current confrontation in Venezuela today is not between left and right.” “We are witnessing the transition from a government with authoritarian tendencies to a dictatorial regime.” “This is not a government ‘backed’ by the military, but, as Maduro himself has said, the government is led by a ‘civilian-military-police alliance’. “Those who continue to support Maduro, including parties and movements of the Sao Paulo Forum or the spokespersons of Podemos in Spain, are causing severe damage to the left in the region and the world. They are damaging anti-capitalist struggles in the broadest sense.” The US embargo is ‘in violation of international law’. This is a useless statement repeated a million times, and it has come back again during the ongoing Israel’s genocidal war. “[A]fter the failure of the current, self-defined “socialist” governments, Venezuelan society tends to associate any reference to socialism or the left with the corruption and authoritarianism of the Maduro governme...