Skip to main content

Palestine Demonstration in London

Why I have not taken part in protests for years.

In UK alone hundreds of thousands demonstrated prior to the war on and invasion of Iraq. They were sent/went back home on the same day. They did not stop the British regime from being part of the crime, and the destruction of Iraq that ensued and lasted for years.

May times demonstration/protests in support of the Palestinians took part in London. They did not change the British regime’s policy in supporting the Israeli state. In this regard, Mark Fisher’s argument is still valid: radicals in Britain should direct their efforts to mobilise working people around social issues at home and attack the British regime’s socio-economic policies. 

A regime change at home is the way forward. We have seen that even with a self-proclaimed socialist like Bernie Sanders, leaders can side with the oppressors and be complicit in crime. Sanders would have not changed American imperialist support of the Israeli state.

Social movements in the beginning of the twenty-first century are fragmented or coopted. ‘Identity politics’ or ‘the politics of recognition’ have sidelined the politics of redistribution. More identity, less class, has been the global trend.

Protests have been in many ways legitimising the existing order: ‘people can express themselves. We live in a democracy,’ etc. Meanwhile, major Western regimes carry on arming and protecting client and authoritarian states.

Demonstrations have also been controlled by both the organisers and the police. There have been no democratic culture in organising those protests by creating multiple platforms and debates of what it should be done. The organisers kept a lid on that. Demonstrations turned into pastime activities.

Furthermore, the conjuncture meant distraction and demonisation of the Other. Blatant racism was manifest in the way Ukrainian refugees – or the refugees from East Germany before 1990 – have been treated in comparison to the way other refugees – brown and black ones – were mistreated or ignored and left to die/be killed.

That has worked well to a significant degree, especially in a conservative country like England where celebrity culture, the adoration of pets, banal TV shows, football, a corporate media, self-centrism, ‘liberal’ feminism, filtered history textbooks … reinforce Western centrism, neo-Orientalism and amnesia. 

Besides a weakened trade union movement since Thatcher, even the recent so-called ‘winter of discontent’ in the aftermath of the pandemic has not led to radicalisation and revival of the labour movement. Radical groups and grouplets remain sectarian and fragmentation prevalent. A few of them even either supported or remained silent while the Assad regime killed and displaced a large number of Syrians. The ‘Palestinian cause’ though remains an arena where they can express their anger. 

Conservatism also means acceptance of obscene inequality, and even applauding wealth accumulation while those who do the socially-valuable work such as nurses, teachers, drivers, etc are undervalued. Celebrities, footballers, TV presenters, are more important and highly paid. Then there is the mass production of clips, games and other means of distraction for instant consumption and the use of subliminal stimuli … That has been normalised and accepted by the general public: no demonstrations against such injustices. Resignation is the norm. Even professors who are supposed to help learners question refrain from expressing their opinion openly.

When I look at events in modern history, especially at  ‘the long 20th century’ and how mass murder could not be stopped and how the ruling classes succeeded in mobilising people to slaughter each other, I am not optimistic in the short run. I see people protest and demonstrate and even counter state violence with counter-violence, but I also see a silent majority sunk into the mondaine and their narrow interests, fostered by the dominant ‘ideology’ of the nation state, of fear, insecurity, consent, and selective mourning and empathy such as this.

There is also a whole machine run by a few people and used for PR and public consumption: it consists of aid organisations, the NGOs industrial complex, ‘the international community’ etc.

And last but not least …

Heiko Khoo speaking:



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Qarmatians (Al-Qaramita)

By Nadeem Mahjoub Documentary film-makers G. Troeller and M. C. Defarge once asked a cabinet minister in South Yemen, why socialistic ideas were so readily acceptable in that part of the Arab world. He replied: “Because we have been communists for a thousand years! My mother was Qarmatian.” Official Muslim scholars and clerics, and many so-called moderates (whether individuals or groups) oppose sedition ( fitna ). Tensions and contradictions in society should be solved peacefully and even if the ruler was unjust and impious, it is generally accepted he should still be obeyed, for any kind of order is better than anarchy and sedition. “The tyranny of a sultan for a hundred years causes less damage than one year’s tyranny exercised by the subjects against one another.” Revolt was justified only against a ruler who clearly went against the command of God and His prophet.” 1 Here we look at not what happened in the minds of people who call for calm, oppose dissent and preach the re...
Varoufakis "speaks of how great it was to have the support of Larry Summers, Norman Lamont, and other figures on the Right, but it was support for whom, for what, and in whose class interests? Class analysis is far from the foreground of the picture sketched out here. Closed rooms and class war
"By 2003, the Libyan government had entered into relations with the International Monetary Fund, privatizing a number of state-owned enterprises. In 2004, Libya opened up 15 new offshore and onshore blocs to drilling. Campbell also chronicles the burrowing actions of the “Western-educated bureaucrats [who] worked to bring Libya into the fold of ‘market reforms,’ and the deepening commercial relations with British capital.”  In 2007, British Petroleum inked a deal with the Libyan Investment Corporation for the exploration of 54,000 square kilometers of the Ghadames and Sirt basins. It also signed training agreements for Libyan professionals, helping create a base for neoliberalism within the government. By 2011, 2800 Libyan professionals were studying in the United Kingdom, learning “Western values” of destatization and thus the removal of the possibility for production and power to be responsive to the demands of the people.  Libya under Qadhaffi was mercurial, but against ...
John Gray, the Guardian, 03 March 2015: "To a significant extent, the new atheism is the expression of a liberal moral panic." "There is no more reason to think science can determine human values today than there was at the time of Haeckel or Huxley. None of the divergent values that atheists have from time to time promoted has any essential connection with atheism, or with science. How could any increase in scientific knowledge validate values such as human equality and personal autonomy? The source of these values is not science. In fact, as the most widely-read atheist thinker of all time [Nietzsche] argued, these quintessential liberal values have their origins in monotheism." "The reason Nietzsche has been excluded from the mainstream of contemporary atheist thinking is that he exposed the problem atheism has with morality. It’s not that atheists can’t be moral – the subject of so many mawkish debates. The question is which morality an atheis...

Capitalism

Some of this reminds me of how five or six years ago in a class of seven students in a UK elite university three of them (two Germans and one British) were in favour of a "benevolent dictator" (in the Arab context). The bloody horrors of Pinochet showed how capitalism will react when it's threatened

Europe's Refugee Camps

"Just three and a half years after the signing of the refugee deal, these camps have become symbols of Europe's failure to protect those who knocked on its door for help. These camps, with Moria chief among them, are now places where already traumatised people are stripped off their dignity." The invisible violence of Europe's refugees camps
"A second position argues against transition, which is transitology itself. It is well known—especially among economists—as the sudden mobilization of a considerable mass of experts who are generally foreigners,generally Western, who come to preach the good word and to propose ready-made models of democracy. The science of the transition has become a financial windfall, a market. And the word transition has of course become a reflex of language, a term of reference, a call for tenders ( appel d’offres ) to which the whole society was supposed to respond.  Consequently, the reticence that one can express is the following: our history is framed, transition is a heteronomy. Every democratic revolution is henceforth supposed to take a unique, imposed path, which is, at the same time, indistinctly democratic and liberal (or neoliberal). A more or less non-“negotiable” package.  It is necessary to highlight the imposed character (and imposed from the outside) of this coming to t...

London

 When you own a country, you do with its wealth whatever you want while your brothers and sisters (Arabs and Muslims) from Lebanon’s “failed state” to Syrian refugees are suffering. You also stretch your arms to help reshape the geo-strategical board of the MENA region. You get support from the heart of “free market democracies” interested in selling you properties and weapons, and they protect you. An Arab revolution that does not spread to overthrow those rotten pigs and employ the Gulf resources for the majority of Arabs, cannot be called a revolution. Sheikh Khalifa’s £5bn London property empire