Skip to main content

Palestine Demonstration in London

Why I have not taken part in protests for years.

In UK alone hundreds of thousands demonstrated prior to the war on and invasion of Iraq. They were sent/went back home on the same day. They did not stop the British regime from being part of the crime, and the destruction of Iraq that ensued and lasted for years.

May times demonstration/protests in support of the Palestinians took part in London. They did not change the British regime’s policy in supporting the Israeli state. In this regard, Mark Fisher’s argument is still valid: radicals in Britain should direct their efforts to mobilise working people around social issues at home and attack the British regime’s socio-economic policies. 

A regime change at home is the way forward. We have seen that even with a self-proclaimed socialist like Bernie Sanders, leaders can side with the oppressors and be complicit in crime. Sanders would have not changed American imperialist support of the Israeli state.

Social movements in the beginning of the twenty-first century are fragmented or coopted. ‘Identity politics’ or ‘the politics of recognition’ have sidelined the politics of redistribution. More identity, less class, has been the global trend.

Protests have been in many ways legitimising the existing order: ‘people can express themselves. We live in a democracy,’ etc. Meanwhile, major Western regimes carry on arming and protecting client and authoritarian states.

Demonstrations have also been controlled by both the organisers and the police. There have been no democratic culture in organising those protests by creating multiple platforms and debates of what it should be done. The organisers kept a lid on that. Demonstrations turned into pastime activities.

Furthermore, the conjuncture meant distraction and demonisation of the Other. Blatant racism was manifest in the way Ukrainian refugees – or the refugees from East Germany before 1990 – have been treated in comparison to the way other refugees – brown and black ones – were mistreated or ignored and left to die/be killed.

That has worked well to a significant degree, especially in a conservative country like England where celebrity culture, the adoration of pets, banal TV shows, football, a corporate media, self-centrism, ‘liberal’ feminism, filtered history textbooks … reinforce Western centrism, neo-Orientalism and amnesia. 

Besides a weakened trade union movement since Thatcher, even the recent so-called ‘winter of discontent’ in the aftermath of the pandemic has not led to radicalisation and revival of the labour movement. Radical groups and grouplets remain sectarian and fragmentation prevalent. A few of them even either supported or remained silent while the Assad regime killed and displaced a large number of Syrians. The ‘Palestinian cause’ though remains an arena where they can express their anger. 

Conservatism also means acceptance of obscene inequality, and even applauding wealth accumulation while those who do the socially-valuable work such as nurses, teachers, drivers, etc are undervalued. Celebrities, footballers, TV presenters, are more important and highly paid. Then there is the mass production of clips, games and other means of distraction for instant consumption and the use of subliminal stimuli … That has been normalised and accepted by the general public: no demonstrations against such injustices. Resignation is the norm. Even professors who are supposed to help learners question refrain from expressing their opinion openly.

When I look at events in modern history, especially at  ‘the long 20th century’ and how mass murder could not be stopped and how the ruling classes succeeded in mobilising people to slaughter each other, I am not optimistic in the short run. I see people protest and demonstrate and even counter state violence with counter-violence, but I also see a silent majority sunk into the mondaine and their narrow interests, fostered by the dominant ‘ideology’ of the nation state, of fear, insecurity, consent, and selective mourning and empathy such as this.

There is also a whole machine run by a few people and used for PR and public consumption: it consists of aid organisations, the NGOs industrial complex, ‘the international community’ etc.

And last but not least …

Heiko Khoo speaking:



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Qarmatians (Al-Qaramita)

By Nadeem Mahjoub Documentary film-makers G. Troeller and M. C. Defarge once asked a cabinet minister in South Yemen, why socialistic ideas were so readily acceptable in that part of the Arab world. He replied: “Because we have been communists for a thousand years! My mother was Qarmatian.” Official Muslim scholars and clerics, and many so-called moderates (whether individuals or groups) oppose sedition ( fitna ). Tensions and contradictions in society should be solved peacefully and even if the ruler was unjust and impious, it is generally accepted he should still be obeyed, for any kind of order is better than anarchy and sedition. “The tyranny of a sultan for a hundred years causes less damage than one year’s tyranny exercised by the subjects against one another.” Revolt was justified only against a ruler who clearly went against the command of God and His prophet.” 1 Here we look at not what happened in the minds of people who call for calm, oppose dissent and preach the re...

Capitalism

Some of this reminds me of how five or six years ago in a class of seven students in a UK elite university three of them (two Germans and one British) were in favour of a "benevolent dictator" (in the Arab context). The bloody horrors of Pinochet showed how capitalism will react when it's threatened
"If you don't attack the economic power of the elite, soon or later it will attack you." That's what the Arab uprisings, for instance, were unable/failed to do. K for Karl – Revolution (episode 3)
"A second position argues against transition, which is transitology itself. It is well known—especially among economists—as the sudden mobilization of a considerable mass of experts who are generally foreigners,generally Western, who come to preach the good word and to propose ready-made models of democracy. The science of the transition has become a financial windfall, a market. And the word transition has of course become a reflex of language, a term of reference, a call for tenders ( appel d’offres ) to which the whole society was supposed to respond.  Consequently, the reticence that one can express is the following: our history is framed, transition is a heteronomy. Every democratic revolution is henceforth supposed to take a unique, imposed path, which is, at the same time, indistinctly democratic and liberal (or neoliberal). A more or less non-“negotiable” package.  It is necessary to highlight the imposed character (and imposed from the outside) of this coming to t...
"In the same way that Robinson [Crusoe] was able to ob­tain a sword, we can just as well suppose that [Man] Friday might appear one fine morning with a loaded revolver in his hand, and from then on the whole relationship of violence is reversed: Man Friday gives the orders and Crusoe is obliged  to work. . . . Thus, the revolver triumphs over the sword, and even the most childish believer in axioms will doubtless form the conclusion that violence is not a simple act of will, but needs for its realization certain very concrete preliminary con­ditions, and in particular the implements of violence; and the more highly developed of these implements will carry the day against primitive ones. Moreover, the very fact of the ability to produce such weapons signifies that the producer of highly developed weapons, in everyday speech the arms  manufac­turer, triumphs over the producer of primitive weapons. To put it briefly, the triumph of violence depends upon the pro­duction of a...
Varoufakis "speaks of how great it was to have the support of Larry Summers, Norman Lamont, and other figures on the Right, but it was support for whom, for what, and in whose class interests? Class analysis is far from the foreground of the picture sketched out here. Closed rooms and class war

US

 Written in June: The candidate who emerged from this jumble of discontent was the man who promised to do the least. His party is now preparing to give us a national election that will be little more than a referendum on the hated Donald Trump. Finally we have a climate in which the American public would unquestionably choose dramatic change were it offered to them, and the party of change has contrived to ensure that it will not be offered. Instead our choice is between two elderly and conservative white men, both with a history of stretching the truth, both with sexual harassment accusations hanging over them, and neither representing any possibility of energetic democratic reform. The old order has been miraculously rescued once again. Such is the climate of opinion in America that, with the right leader, remarkable things would be possible. Instead we are presented with Joe Biden, an affable DC veteran with a hand in many of the defining disasters of the last 30 years: worker-c...