Skip to main content

العنصرية في تونس: إذلال ذوي البشرة السوداء

 عن علي خنيس، فيسبوك

هذه الصورة منذ سنوات لمهاجر من أفريقيا جنوب الصحراء. قالها منذ سنوات انه لا يريد الموت في تونس، ولانه لم يدخلها الا مكرها بقوة حراس حدود أوروبا بالوكالة وتجار البشر الذين تتقاطع مصالحهم. كما أنه لم يتخيّل حينها أنه سيتعرّض هو أو غيره من المهاجرين والمهاجرات سود البشرة جنوب الصحراء لعمليّات سحل على الهواء مباشرة من قبل تونسيين هم نفسهم ضحايا لنفس السياسات العنصرية الأوروبية التي تعيد الدولة إنتاجها على شعبها ويعيد شرائح من شعبها إنتاجها على المهاجرين والمهاجرات جنوب الصحراء.

وهؤلاء نفسهم يمارسون العنصرية ضد أبناء شعبهم من التونسيين والتونسيات سود البشرة ولا يرونهم ويرونهنّ إلاّ "وصفان، عبيد وغيرها من التسميات التي يستعملونها في الإشارة لهم وبلا خجل.
دولة عنصرية اسمها تونس تقع في شمال أفريقيا أيقظت كل نزعات العنصرية والكراهية الكامنة في المجتمع تحت إشراف خطاب رئاسي يتبنّى كل مقولات أقصى اليمين الفاشي الأوروبي من نظرية الاستبدال و"تغيير التركيبة الديمغرافية" إلى "المؤمرات والمخططات التي يحضر لها منذ عقود" وتستمعلها للتغطية على الفشل السياسي والاقتصادي وعلى إنخراطها في تنفيذ سياسات الهجرة الأوروبية العنصرية رغم الثرثرة المستمرة عن السيادة الوطنية وهم ما تعرّيه الممارسات اليومية المنهجية و المتكررة.
مرة أخرى علينا العودة لجملة هشام جعيّط التي قالها في حوار له في الثمانينات. "أشعر بانتماء ذليل اكثر فأكثر لهذا البلد."
هذا العار سيحتاج لاجيال واجيال حتى يمحى.
كلنا مهاجرون، مهما اختلفت الألوان، ضحايا الإذلال المزدوج; سياسات الإذلال الأوروبية، و سياسات دولة الإذلال" الوطني السيادي".
جمهورية اللغو تقول انها لن تكون حارسا للمتوسط. في مقابل تواصل نفس السياسات القديمة-المتجددة في ممارسة دور حارس حدود أوروبا بتمويلات لوجستية وتدريبات اوروبية.
انا في هذه الحالة متمسك بأحد الأقوال المأثورة التي قالها تونسي درجة ثانية من البرّ اللوطاني من وراء البلايك كما تصنّفه الدولة ايام حراك جرجيس 18/18 :
"كانك احمد متعملنّاش فاها انك احمد ونص، خاطر حني نعرفوا بلاّزمه انك حتى أحمد ما تجيش"




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Qarmatians (Al-Qaramita)

By Nadeem Mahjoub Documentary film-makers G. Troeller and M. C. Defarge once asked a cabinet minister in South Yemen, why socialistic ideas were so readily acceptable in that part of the Arab world. He replied: “Because we have been communists for a thousand years! My mother was Qarmatian.” Official Muslim scholars and clerics, and many so-called moderates (whether individuals or groups) oppose sedition ( fitna ). Tensions and contradictions in society should be solved peacefully and even if the ruler was unjust and impious, it is generally accepted he should still be obeyed, for any kind of order is better than anarchy and sedition. “The tyranny of a sultan for a hundred years causes less damage than one year’s tyranny exercised by the subjects against one another.” Revolt was justified only against a ruler who clearly went against the command of God and His prophet.” 1 Here we look at not what happened in the minds of people who call for calm, oppose dissent and preach the re...

Capitalism

Some of this reminds me of how five or six years ago in a class of seven students in a UK elite university three of them (two Germans and one British) were in favour of a "benevolent dictator" (in the Arab context). The bloody horrors of Pinochet showed how capitalism will react when it's threatened
"If you don't attack the economic power of the elite, soon or later it will attack you." That's what the Arab uprisings, for instance, were unable/failed to do. K for Karl – Revolution (episode 3)
"A second position argues against transition, which is transitology itself. It is well known—especially among economists—as the sudden mobilization of a considerable mass of experts who are generally foreigners,generally Western, who come to preach the good word and to propose ready-made models of democracy. The science of the transition has become a financial windfall, a market. And the word transition has of course become a reflex of language, a term of reference, a call for tenders ( appel d’offres ) to which the whole society was supposed to respond.  Consequently, the reticence that one can express is the following: our history is framed, transition is a heteronomy. Every democratic revolution is henceforth supposed to take a unique, imposed path, which is, at the same time, indistinctly democratic and liberal (or neoliberal). A more or less non-“negotiable” package.  It is necessary to highlight the imposed character (and imposed from the outside) of this coming to t...
"In the same way that Robinson [Crusoe] was able to ob­tain a sword, we can just as well suppose that [Man] Friday might appear one fine morning with a loaded revolver in his hand, and from then on the whole relationship of violence is reversed: Man Friday gives the orders and Crusoe is obliged  to work. . . . Thus, the revolver triumphs over the sword, and even the most childish believer in axioms will doubtless form the conclusion that violence is not a simple act of will, but needs for its realization certain very concrete preliminary con­ditions, and in particular the implements of violence; and the more highly developed of these implements will carry the day against primitive ones. Moreover, the very fact of the ability to produce such weapons signifies that the producer of highly developed weapons, in everyday speech the arms  manufac­turer, triumphs over the producer of primitive weapons. To put it briefly, the triumph of violence depends upon the pro­duction of a...
Varoufakis "speaks of how great it was to have the support of Larry Summers, Norman Lamont, and other figures on the Right, but it was support for whom, for what, and in whose class interests? Class analysis is far from the foreground of the picture sketched out here. Closed rooms and class war

US

 Written in June: The candidate who emerged from this jumble of discontent was the man who promised to do the least. His party is now preparing to give us a national election that will be little more than a referendum on the hated Donald Trump. Finally we have a climate in which the American public would unquestionably choose dramatic change were it offered to them, and the party of change has contrived to ensure that it will not be offered. Instead our choice is between two elderly and conservative white men, both with a history of stretching the truth, both with sexual harassment accusations hanging over them, and neither representing any possibility of energetic democratic reform. The old order has been miraculously rescued once again. Such is the climate of opinion in America that, with the right leader, remarkable things would be possible. Instead we are presented with Joe Biden, an affable DC veteran with a hand in many of the defining disasters of the last 30 years: worker-c...