Skip to main content

Posts

Attacking North Korea?

Here is an argument published by foreignpolicy.com exactly a year ago: One mistaken reason to avoid attacking North Korea is the fear of direct retaliation. The U.S. intelligence community has reportedly claimed that North Korea already has ballistic missiles with nuclear warheads that can reach as far as the United States. But this is almost certainly an exaggeration, or rather an anticipation of a future that could still be averted by prompt action. It’s true that North Korea could retaliate for any attack by using its conventional rocket artillery against the South Korean capital of Seoul and its surroundings, where almost 20 million inhabitants live within 35 miles of the armistice line. U.S. military officers have cited the fear of a “sea of fire” to justify inaction. But this vulnerability should not paralyze U.S. policy for one simple reason: It is very largely self-inflicted. [G]iven South Korea’s deliberate inaction over many years, any damage ultimately done to Seoul
England: the rule of capital and corporate university "Up to a quarter of students in England are doing degrees that will not give them sufficient earnings to justify the cost of their loans, a think tank says. The centre-right group urges ministers to cut places on those courses offering little financial return and increase those in post-18 technical education." The centre-right group is obviously a defender of capital running universities and determining what education should students pursue. Instead of scrapping fees or make higher education almost free like in most countries, the solution is to scrap places because they are not marketable. The purpose is to create a debt-enslaved, pliable workforce.
"Capitalism is killing us" Translated to Arabic as "The capitalist terrorism ... How modern life is killing us without blood"  الإرهاب الرأسمالي ... هكذا تقتلنا الحياة الحديثة دون دماء